0

I have also seen many posts on this. I understand what the line is used for legally. The Kármán plane or a plane that is most efficient at the line regardless of the shape seems not to have a specific purpose but maybe I am wrong?

I left this link below as an example on how the line might be used:

Challenging the Kármán line from above

enter image description here

Glorfindel
  • 723
  • 1
  • 9
  • 22
Muze
  • 1
  • 3
  • 24
  • 92

2 Answers2

3

It's a pretty abstract boundary, with gradual changes either side, of no practical use.

No "line" has never[sic] found a practical use in engineering, and it has been misinterpreted by lawyers as having some physical significance it does not in fact have.

"How High the Sky?" Thomas Gangale, p. 156

3

For a number of reasons human reasons like giving someone astronaut wings, winning the X prize or for rules around national boundaries there is a need for a hard divider between 'space' and 'atmosphere' and the calculations for the Karman line provide a convenient mathematical way to do that. The fact that the Karman line of 100km used for most purposes is actually some distance from the ~85km point that Karman calculated is possibly telling in terms of how meaningful the value is other than it being a round number higher than aircraft can fly and lower than space craft can sensibly sustain orbit.

So the Karman line is a legal construct for space law and administration, and almost meaningless for actual engineering.

GremlinWranger
  • 22,391
  • 1
  • 56
  • 87
  • What about for reentry? – Muze Dec 26 '18 at 18:14
  • 1
    @Muze - The only real impact to re-entry is that legally you would need airspace and traffic clearance for every nation your profile crosses below 100km, so a complication in doing space operations out of smaller nations. All other engineering for heat/drag etc needs to start well above that point and be tapered in. – GremlinWranger Dec 26 '18 at 22:55
  • 1
    but even that is a legal impact, not a physical one –  Dec 27 '18 at 21:44