6

The only reference paper I have found on this subject is this paper by Landis, which is a great introduction to sling launchers - but the concept has been around for some time and there must be other treatments. At any rate, it is a simple device where a motor on a tower spins two cables - one bearing a payload and the other a counterweight - so fast that when released the payload flies into orbit or beyond. Modern motors are capable of doing this, and would even be highly efficient, if the cables used are very long - on the order of 50 km or more. The cables have to be incredibly strong, that's all.

The paper looks at the use of modern materials for such a device, but only briefly because the cables would be huge and extremely costly. It moves on to future possibilities using carbon nanotube cables.

If fullerene materials are not available, the concept could be implemented with existing materials. This increases the tether mass, and the sling launch becomes more difficult, but not impossible. The highest strength-to-weight ration for a currently available tether material are obtained with Poly(p-phenylene-2,6-benzobisoxazole), or "PBO" fibers, or with gel-spun polyethylene fibers. PBO (sold under the trade name "Zylon®") has a with tensile strength of 5.8 GPA, and density of 1.54 g/cm3 [12, 13]. High-strength polyethylene fiber (sold under the trade name Spectra-2000) has an ultimate strength of 4.0 GPa and a density of 0.97 g/cm3 [11]. Assuming an engineering factor of 2.5, the allowable load strength for the Spectra-2000 fiber is 1.6 GPa. For the example case of a launch to lunar orbit, 1.68 km/second, the required acceleration is 5.7 g (56 m/sec2 ). To carry a thousand kilogram payload, the force will be 56000 N. This will require a cable cross-section of 0.35 square centimeters at the tip. Since the cable must have additional cross-section to carry its own weight as well as the end mass, the cable must now be made to increase in cross-section from the tip to a wider cross-section toward the hub. This taper increases the cable mass. The cable mass is now about 2500 kg, no longer less than the mass of the launched object, but still a value which is feasible for an engineering system.

How was this analysis of the cable done?

The reference paper made this calculation for escape velocity from the Moon. Could these materials take much more load without snapping under their own weight in such a scenario?

kim holder
  • 21,377
  • 9
  • 85
  • 188
  • You need to clarify a few things to make this question answerable: 1. What orbit do you want to achieve? This will determine the release velocity you have to achieve. 2. What's the mass of the object you're trying to sling? This, combined with the orbit question, will determine the requirements of the cables. – mLuby Apr 28 '15 at 00:46
  • 1
    @MichaelLuby As I understand it a cable with current materials that could support its own weight and launch something into orbit is at the limit of what is possible, so I was pretty vague about specifics. But your point is well taken. Let me think about it and make an edit. – kim holder Apr 28 '15 at 02:00
  • 1
    The was a Nasa Space Flight thread on slinging stuff from the moon: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=5420.0 – HopDavid Apr 28 '15 at 05:32
  • 2
    @HopDavid Just a note that they're NASASpaceFlight.com and it's just a name of a website. The way you wrote it suggests NASA associates with it. It doesn't. Misleading name doesn't really discredit it, it's IMO a good forum, I just thought to make that clear to anyone that doesn't know that. – TildalWave Apr 28 '15 at 07:19
  • @MichaelLuby No. Feasibility of specific orbits, payload mass, even maximum radial acceleration and centrifugal force that would define suitability of such a launch system for humans is exactly what has yet to be established by analyzing performance of current high tensile strength cable technology. It's then pretty straightforward maths (numerical integration) and physics from then on. As in, you need this release speed (∆v) for that orbit, this cable length (ω²r) for that max acceleration, this much mass (M⋅a) for each release speed that the cable and payload could tolerate, and so on. – TildalWave Apr 28 '15 at 07:33
  • @HopDavid very interesting reading – kim holder Apr 28 '15 at 13:53
  • The link to 'this paper' http://home.earthlink.net/~geoffrey.landis/Lunar_Sling_Launcher.pdf seems not to work. 2. Why does the cable need to be 50 km long? I would have guessed about one hundred meters would work well.
  • – Matthew Christopher Bartsh Apr 21 '21 at 09:54
  • @MatthewChristopherBartsh thanks for alerting me to the broken link, it's now fixed. The longer the cable is, the lower the acceleration experienced by the payload. It turns over a longer distance and that happens more slowly. – kim holder Apr 21 '21 at 16:05
  • What is the advantage in that? – Matthew Christopher Bartsh Apr 21 '21 at 16:19
  • The acceleration feels like gravity, the higher it is, the greater the force pressing the contents of the payload vessel against the wall opposite the tether. By having a long cable, that force is low enough that most payloads can handle it, in particular people. – kim holder Apr 21 '21 at 16:26