Romania enters Schengen in March 2024 after agreement with Austria
Is this actually true or is it the same old story?
Romania enters Schengen in March 2024 after agreement with Austria
Is this actually true or is it the same old story?
Based on the Council decision mentioned in the comments, it seems Bulgaria and Romania are indeed very close to actually entering the Schengen area. The Council hasn't committed to a specific date for lifting the checks on land borders (and Austria implicitly retains a veto on that) but Bulgaria and Romania would count as part of the Schengen area and start issuing Schengen visas from April 2024. Recital 8 and article 2 even specify what should happen to national visas issued before that date, implicitly confirming that national short-stay visas would not exist anymore afterwards.
This is especially significant for third-country citizens (i.e. people from outside the EU). It would mean that time spent in Romania and Bulgaria would count towards the 90 days maximum stay in the Schengen area, that visas issued by either country would allow stays in the rest of the Schengen area (under the usual conditions), and that there would be no need to juggle two visa applications for a visit covering these countries and (other) Schengen countries. Similarly, people from outside the EU residing in Romania or Bulgaria would gain the right to visit other Schengen countries without any additional formality.
One practical difference for all people travelling by air between Romania, Bulgaria, and the rest of the Schengen area would be avoiding queues at the destination airport. EU citizens (including Romanian and Bulgarian citizens) are already supposed to undergo only minimal checks and can typically use automated passport gates, at least if they have a passport, but they still have to queue.
I initially found it a bit odd that it was announced by Austria, Bulgaria, and Romania without any word from the EU Commission or other member states like Spain (currently presiding the EU Council) but my reading of the decision is that this goes beyond the “same old story” of kicking the can down the road.
Incidentally, I will note that the provisions on border checks at internal Schengen borders have become very weak in practice. Schengen countries routinely reimpose checks, either by repeatedly invoking the official “temporary” mechanism or simply by ignoring the rules and pretending the checks are somehow “not systematic”. So even if the decision says that “The Council shall endeavour to take a decision lifting checks on persons at internal land borders”, the fact is that they could go on for a long time without much impact on the rest of the rules governing the Schengen area.