Some solar panels use silicon crystals that required careful purification and enormous quantities of energy. Some types use cadmium, which is highly toxic. Several types are noted by Wikipedia.
If we consider energy to manufacture, material toxicity, ability to be recycled, and average useful life, does any type of photovoltaic cell stand out about the others? Has this analysis been done by anyone?
- Cost to make. (Expense ultimatly ties back to other economic activity which all has an impact)
- Environmental Impact to make.
- EI to dispose of
- Service life (Suppose they were cheap, non-toxic, but lasted only a year?)
- EI on land. (Suppose they were cheap, non-toxic, but were only 5% efficient -- 3 times as much land needed.)
– Sherwood Botsford Mar 30 '13 at 12:39