16

My wife shared this picture with me today:

picture of a cartoon corgi doing the doggie paddle in space and moving forward

Adorable, but it got me thinking about that trope - swimming in space.

I've seen it before, mostly in cartoons and not live-action shows, the latter of which tend to have either more realistic space stations that astronauts pull themselves along on rails to get around in, or fictional artificial gravity.

My question then is three-part:

  1. Can a person actually 'swim' to get around in a real spacecraft?
  2. Could they do this in the vacuum of space? (Assuming they have proper space protection)
  3. Could a Pembroke Welsh Corgi on the ISS do a doggie paddle to get around?
Zibbobz
  • 262
  • 1
  • 2
  • 8

3 Answers3

13

You can sort of swim, but it would be very slow. The viscosity of air vs water is very low. Therefore the 'scoop' your hands or feet can get of the fluid, to propel it, and thus move you around would need to be much higher.

If you had fans (or 'wings') on your arms you would be more effective.

As for the corgi? Not likely, or at least very, very slowly.

You might be more effective inhaling with a wide open mouth slowly, then quickly exhaling through a small mouth in the direction opposite you wish to go.

geoffc
  • 79,523
  • 12
  • 227
  • 419
  • 2
    Astronaut Dan Barry tried "swimming" in the ISS. It did not work. https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/18386/tiny-emergency-propulsive-device-if-stuck-floating-in-a-large-volume-in-microgra/18485#18485 – Organic Marble Mar 30 '18 at 18:34
  • 2
    @OrganicMarble: Nowhere in the text in the linked answer does Barry actually mention "swimming" - reading that text, it sounds more like he was trying to move by thrashing his limbs, which doesn't work even in water. Additionally, swimming through air would be quite slow, to the point where it would take quite a while to realise that you were, in fact, moving. – Vikki Aug 16 '20 at 19:38
  • @Sean I guess it depends on your definition of "swimming". I am not as confident about how swimming in air would actually work as you seem to be. – Organic Marble Aug 16 '20 at 19:48
  • @OrganicMarble I think that Dan Barry story is some sort of joke. – Matthew Christopher Bartsh Apr 22 '21 at 20:55
  • @MatthewChristopherBartsh Why would you think that? – Organic Marble Apr 22 '21 at 21:23
  • @OrganicMarble Are you kidding me? – Matthew Christopher Bartsh Apr 22 '21 at 21:37
  • @MatthewChristopherBartsh No. – Organic Marble Apr 22 '21 at 21:38
  • 1
  • 'Sneezing and spitting didn't do much good either.' That implies that he sneezed and spat. Sneezing is an involuntary act, so how did he try it as a way to get to a wall. Sneezing in a space station or the like is highly frowned on, because it is unhygienic in the extreme, and disrespectful to everyone else, because whatever particles you sneeze out will float on the air rather than falling to the ground, and can easily be inhaled, a major health hazard. Deliberately spitting would be even worse. No astronaut would admit to having done that deliberately. 2. How would an astronaut not...
  • – Matthew Christopher Bartsh Apr 22 '21 at 21:48
  • @OrganicMarble ...know that there is a law of conservation of momentum that has no exceptions (not even in relativity and quantum mechanics, by the way), and it not only allows rocket propulsion, but also propeller propulsion and so by causing air to move one way, by blowing or fanning the air with his hands in one direction he can move his body in the opposite direction. It's clearly a joke. A useful lesson in physics made into a humorous untrue anecdote. A joke. – Matthew Christopher Bartsh Apr 22 '21 at 21:55
  • 1
    @MatthewChristopherBartsh I hate to tell that I know Barry personally (here's a picture of he and I in a tank together) and I know for a fact that this happened. Theorize all you like. https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-105/images/high/KSC-01PP-1305.jpg – Organic Marble Apr 22 '21 at 21:56
  • @OrganicMarble My theory is that you never asked him whether he was being serious. – Matthew Christopher Bartsh Apr 22 '21 at 21:58
  • @MatthewChristopherBartsh I should have said I knew him personally. Haven't talked to him since he left NASA. Anyway, I'm gonna believe him over you. – Organic Marble Apr 22 '21 at 22:08
  • @OrganicMarble I made it into a question just now. https://space.stackexchange.com/q/51610/40252 – Matthew Christopher Bartsh Apr 22 '21 at 22:22
  • @MatthewChristopherBartsh I can't answer because it's hearsay. Best wishes. – Organic Marble Apr 22 '21 at 22:24
  • 2
    @MatthewChristopherBartsh - actually doesn't "conservation of momentum" only apply to the system as a whole and might not apply to an object subject to a small or large impulse in a liquid/gas with viscosity? In other words, if, while floating in air, you breath in slowly, that might not change your momentum much in the space you're floating in, but then you exhale quickly it could? Check your assumptions. The facile answer isn't always right. – davidbak May 05 '21 at 21:14
  • @davidbak MatthewChristopherBartsh said that momentum conservation means that it is possible to propel yourself "by blowing or fanning the air", i.e. the same thing you said, not the opposite claim that you seem to be rebutting. – benrg May 06 '21 at 18:50