1

I was just getting used to “cis” and “trans” for orbits inside and outside the Lunar orbit. “Trans” is a Latin word root meaning “across, beyond, or through”(Meriam Webster).

“Trans” seems like a better choice than “super” (also Latin) meaning “over, above” (Meriam Webster). The key here is whether the object crossed the defining line. Mars may be a “supralunar” body, but it is certainly not “translunar”. A journey to Mars is translunar, but not Mars itself.

On the other hand, a satellite transferred to GSO may have used a “transynchronous” trajectory. But it was only supersynchronous for a short part of its journey.

It’s hard enough to use “cis” and “trans” correctly here on Earth without causing confusion in the Heavens.

BrendanLuke15
  • 9,755
  • 2
  • 26
  • 80
Woody
  • 21,532
  • 56
  • 146
  • 1
    I always read the term as "supersynchronous" = "more than synchronous" = "longer period than synchronous", not as "translunar" = "behind the moon". So, at least for me, it makes sense to have "supersynchronous" and (not actually used) something like "trans-geo-stationary". One is motion-wise, one is position-wise. – asdfex Jan 12 '22 at 10:23

2 Answers2

2

I know (from personal experience) that the term and concept "supersynchronous" was being used back in the 1980s, at least. That was long, long before anybody started talking about cis-lunar space and the like. Sometimes the terminology isn't consistent, but I guess that's OK as long as we all understand what each other is saying.

John McCarthy
  • 997
  • 5
  • 8
  • 2
    The term "cislunar" was used during Apollo. "The Apollo 12 crew now making preparations for cislunar navigation tasks. " Apollo 12 Flight Journal https://history.nasa.gov/afj/ap12fj/21day8_cislunar_nav.html – Organic Marble Jan 15 '22 at 01:55
  • @John McCarthy --- Neologisms are coming at us fast and furious. Elon seams to think everything big is "giga". At least "trans" and "supra" are reasonably synonymous with "beyond". – Woody Jan 15 '22 at 02:43
1

To back up @John McCarthy's answer I just happened to run across the following passage from Military Communications - 1968: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives which while it doesn't contain "supersynchronous" it does contain "subsynchronous" in reference to LES-5 1967-066E which according to n2yo.com/satellite/?s=2866 has a semimajor axis of 39,779 km and a period of 21.93 hours and a mean motion of 1.0943 orbits per day.

As you know, the MIT-Lincoln Laboratory experimental ultra-high-frequency satellite (LES-5) was successfully launched last July into a subsynchronous equatorial orbit. Since that time, joint test operations have been conducted by the military departments using "off-the-shelf" terminals. In March of this year, the satellite experienced some degradation due to a transistor failure in a preamplifier...

LES-5 position from https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=2866

Here's LES-1 1965-008C for reference from Lincoln_Laboratory_LES-1_1965

Lincoln Laboratory launched LES-1 in 1965 originally from NASA

uhoh
  • 148,791
  • 53
  • 476
  • 1,473