25

A comment by SF. regarding the InSight Mars lander caught my attention:

I really, really wonder why they didn't just include a small compartment with a duster brush grippable by the robotic arm.

Dust on the solar panels is a major issue for Mars landers without an RTG, and InSight does have a robotic arm. So adding a brush of some sort (either fixed to the arm or graspable) sounds like a good idea. It hasn't been done and (AFAIK) no other lander had this either, ever.

What could be the reason for not including a brush? Simple oversight or are there issues that are worse than having dust on the solar panels?

(Secondary question: Would a fan work in the thin atmosphere to blow away most of the dust?)

Fred
  • 13,060
  • 4
  • 41
  • 78
DarkDust
  • 12,547
  • 4
  • 54
  • 86
  • 1
    @SF answer section is below. – UKMonkey Nov 30 '18 at 13:58
  • Partial cleaning of solar panels might not help. If several cells are connected in series to increase voltage, the cell with most dust limits current of the whole string. – Uwe Nov 30 '18 at 15:27
  • 1
    @Uwe: I'd be quite surprised if the engineers so obsessed with safety, redundancy and robustness would risk the entire mission on a single cell going bad. BTW, as for interference with experiments, I think lack of power would interfere more. – SF. Nov 30 '18 at 16:10
  • @SF. see the electrical systemm of the ISS. The voltage from solar panels at peak power point is about 160 V. This voltage is possible only with a lot of cells connected in series. – Uwe Nov 30 '18 at 17:14
  • I would think that (since there's no moisture and thus very little adhesion) turning the solar panels upside down would be easier and better than sweeping them. – xyious Nov 30 '18 at 18:00
  • 1
    Would they be covered in... (wait for it...) @DarkDust ? – DrSheldon Nov 30 '18 at 19:24
  • @SF. See this NASA paper about Shadow effects on a series-parallel array of solar cells. – Uwe Nov 30 '18 at 21:55
  • @Uwe: Saw it, and tried to look how the panels are connected. First off, the panels don't get covered 100% by the dust, and then, uncovering even half of a series-connected segment gives a decent rise in the voltage. Opponents of the solution concentrate on comparing how weak it is to panels working 100%. I compare it to effects of doing nothing. – SF. Dec 01 '18 at 19:48
  • I think a hair dryer could be very efficient. (Without the heating part of course.) – Cornelis Dec 12 '18 at 15:04
  • 1
    not exactly a brush, but it is mechanical removal of dust by something that was in some way first manipulated by the lander: https://space.stackexchange.com/a/52516/12102 – uhoh Jun 03 '21 at 22:25
  • I think a windscreen wiper would do the trick. It is cheap, safe and also reliable. A fan wouldn’t work so well. – The Rocket fan Jul 06 '22 at 10:04