6

I've been working on a design for a sounding rocket that can go to the Karman line, that I want to make my senior capstone project next year. As a part of this process, I am making a program to estimate the maximum altitude attained by the rocket and its going pretty well.

Here is the estimated flight for a 1000lbf engine with 120 lbs of total rocket and 80% fuel by weight: enter image description here

However, the current estimation I have is still a huuuuuge over estimation because it does not consider the effects of trans and supersonic flight on the coefficient of drag, which I imagine will have a dramatic impact on this code's output (notice the max velocity is 6800 ft/s...)

I was able to find this image relating atlas Cd to mach number here:

enter image description here

See this answer and way back machine for source.

How can I make a curve similar to this for our project? The rocket body is going to be a (ogive or parabolic probably) cone with a long cylindrical body and fins. I estimate that the Cd will be about .2-.25 at low speed flight.

How can I go about making a curve like this? How do I know at what mach number the pressure will be highest for my design? Should I change nose-cone shape to reduce drag at sonic speed? Are there any resources to guide me in the right direction here? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. We have access to a pretty slow wind tunnel and fluid dynamics software if that can help us any.

Thanks!

uhoh
  • 148,791
  • 53
  • 476
  • 1,473
  • How fast is a "pretty slow" wind tunnel? – Russell Borogove Nov 25 '18 at 03:25
  • @RussellBorogove I've added a link to one of your answers (as source for the figure). – uhoh Nov 25 '18 at 04:06
  • 2
    Welcome to Space, and congratulations on writing our 9000th question! – DrSheldon Nov 25 '18 at 06:11
  • @Russel Borogrove Its only 90 MPH. I might also be able to ask some nearby aerospace companies if they have a tunnel. I might have some connections that can help me out, but if I start asking I need a plan on how to collect the data I need. – WhisperingShiba Nov 27 '18 at 18:41
  • 2
    I don't have a definitive answer, but this paper on supersonic aerodynamics might be helpful. I note that figure 10-9 shows many aircraft having a generally similar Cd vs mach curve up to M2.0 that is not too dissimilar from the Atlas data. While you're waiting for a better answer you could do worse than estimating a curve based on those models and your low-speed data... – Russell Borogove Nov 27 '18 at 20:51
  • 1
    Not an answer to your question, but you can find data from a similar flight at the CSXT web site: http://www.ddeville.com/GoFast_Flight_data.xls That the velocity curve doesn't have the sharp cusp that yours does, which makes me wonder where that comes from. (The main CSXT page describes the rocket: http://www.ddeville.com/derek/CSXT.htm) – Bob Jacobsen Nov 28 '18 at 08:37
  • @BobJacobsen Good observation. In this flight model, I do not take into account the change of thrust as a function of the altitude due to expansion ratio, and I do not have a thrust curve which decreases thrust as a function of the tank pressure (this is a work in progress). As a result the thrust is constant as the density of air drops, so the velocity is concave up as expected. Thanks for that excel table, I think this will be very useful to verify our code! – WhisperingShiba Nov 30 '18 at 02:34

0 Answers0