32

Let's say a non-US citizen (legal or illegal immigrant) is resident in the US and has a valid postal address in a state without "Voter ID" laws. Would anything prevent such a person from registering to vote in federal and state elections?

There is a related question on impersonating a registered voter, but I'm interested in the process of becoming a registered voter in the first place.

Rick Smith
  • 35,501
  • 5
  • 100
  • 160
JonathanReez
  • 50,757
  • 35
  • 237
  • 435
  • 22
    There is nothing stopping non-citizens from registering in voter ID states too (e.g. Texas has a conviction for a non-citizen voter). All voter ID does is verify that the voter is identified as person at address. I.e. the picture on the ID matches the person trying to vote and the name and address on the ID matches the voter registration. In states without voter ID, I could show up on election day and say I'm Jonathan Reez from whatever address, and there is no way to check. (Assumes that there is a Jonathan Reez registered at that address.) – Brythan Mar 27 '18 at 00:15
  • This seems like a better-stated version of this question: https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/24873/can-non-us-citizens-vote-in-the-presidential-election-in-california/24877#24877 – grovkin Mar 28 '18 at 07:13
  • 14
    Perhaps more relevant is the question "Is anything preventing US citizens from voting in US elections? And if not, why don't more of them do it?" The problem in the US is not too many people voting, it is too few. – Simd Mar 28 '18 at 10:24
  • 6
    perhaps not, but likewise there's nothing stopping you from shooting a random stranger either, except laws. – dandavis Mar 28 '18 at 10:50
  • 1
    I don't believe this is a question the poster has, to me that is pure rhetoric. – Jeffrey Mar 28 '18 at 13:41
  • 8
    There's a law against it. Can a law against something be said to "prevent" it? Does the answer depend on the strength of the law's enforcement? – phoog Mar 28 '18 at 15:40
  • @phoog - reality points to likelyhood that a law doesn't prevent things it prohibits from happening completely. Especially when the likelyhood of being caught is so low. – user4012 Mar 28 '18 at 17:00
  • 1
    @dandavis - the likelyhood that Law Enforcement will find you if you do that is very very high. The likelyhood that Law Enforcement would even know that someone broke a voting law is near zero due to lack of ability to check citizenship reliably, even if one uses their real identity. Never mind finding out that a specific person did it if they use a fake identity. So, it's not an equivalent comparison. This is more like jaywalking, or smoking MJ at home. There's nothing stopping people from doing it aside from the law... so, they are not stopping and do it. – user4012 Mar 28 '18 at 17:02
  • @Lembik - I think there was a question on the site asking about low participation rates, actually. – user4012 Mar 28 '18 at 17:04
  • @dandavis Except that if you try to do that in a street people will react. They may shoot you back, police might arrest you. It would make news and you'd probably face consequences. On the other hand you can vote illegally in plain sight, and nobody will notice. The only case in which you could be caught is if police stops you right after voting and realizes that you are not eligible to vote or if you are caught on TV exiting the building and someone that hates you sees you on TV and calls the authorities. – Bakuriu Mar 28 '18 at 20:15
  • @user4012 about reality and prevention and prohibition: of course that is correct. I was trying to clarify to what extent the question asks about legal measures as opposed to practical measures. JonathanReez: re-reading the question now, I note that registering and voting are different. A registered voter who is not qualified still commits a crime (at least under US and NY law) by voting. – phoog Apr 04 '18 at 14:39
  • Keep in mind that "non-voter-ID" <> "no ID required." "Voter ID" is usually a narrow subset of potential identification that could be used, chosen more for the ability to make voting more difficult for particular demographic groups. – PoloHoleSet Jul 30 '18 at 22:38

9 Answers9

38

My answer here shows that it is trivially easy to do in California.

The answer details official CA procedures, and at no point do they require anything that would prove citizenship (nor, offer the state ability to check citizenship without offered proof).

Short version:

  1. When registering to vote (quoting from my own answer, NOT from source supporting documents)

    The important part is that California's driver's license is OPTIONAL, and you can simply provide last 4 digits of SSN (which of course an illegal or non-citizen legal can make up) or even leave empty. You are NOT required to submit an ID by California.

    So, step 1 in the process is to register to vote without supplying an ID. You can either leave SSN empty, or use fake 4 digits.

    Or, for legal non-citizens, even use your real 4 digits - the state cannot conclusively check someone's citizenship status based on just 4 digits of SSN and a name, especially for common names (just because your SSN 4 digits matched a non-citizen immigrant in INS's database, doesn't mean that was you. But you can just leave SSN empty).

    As another aside, I don't think CA even checks citizenship even if it could - because legal non-citizen are eligible to vote in local elections in CA as far as I know, so they are actually permitted to register to vote. And you can't tell if someone is a citizen or illegal by name+SSNx4, since there is no database of either set.

  2. When voting in person, you need two types of IDs:

    As you can see, you are not required to prove your citizenship here either. You can bring utility bills. You can bring student ID cards (which, obviously, don't require one to be a citizen). ...

    While these (first set of required IDs) all are photo IDs, none of these are restricted to citizens. But, as per above, you don't even need a photo ID.

    None of these (second set of required IDs) are restricted to citizens. Some are easy to forge (especially A and B).

    When voting by mail, as linked answer shows, the accepted ID lists to be sent are identical to voting in person, and none of them are restricted to citizens, nor allow the state to check citizenship status based on them.

    So, step 2 is to vote in person or by mail, by supplying one of the following ((E) credit or debit card; (G) student identification card; (H) health club identification card; (I) insurance plan identification card) and one of the following ((A) utility bill; (B) bank statement; (C) government check; (O) identification documents issued by governmental disability agencies; (P) identification documents issued by government homeless shelters and other government temporary or transitional facilities)

    Note that none of the documents in either set allows finding out citizenship status by the state, even if the state was so inclined. Additionally, most of those documents are trivial to fake, especially second set.

user4012
  • 92,336
  • 19
  • 225
  • 386
27

Because if you vote as non-citizen, you have huge personal downside (likely prosecution), with very little upside (being the deciding vote tipping the election), benefiting mostly someone else: a politician.

There are 3 "filters/multipliers" why such upside is very small:

  • likelihood that illegal vote will tip the election. If politician wins or loses regardless of the illegal vote, no upside.
  • likelihood of winning the election
  • likelihood that elected politician deliver on his/her promises if elected - and even if the politician introduced the promised action, there is no guarantee it will became a law.

I do not know about any other crime where the criminal is required to prove his identity and address as requirement to committing the crime. Any such vote would be by mistake and misunderstanding, I think.

phoog in comments mentions even bigger downside for illegal voting:

In addition to possible criminal penalties, unlawful voting makes an alien inadmissible to the US and deportable from the US, which can of course prevent naturalization (8 USC 1182(a)(10)(D) on admissibility, 8 USC 1227(a)(6) on deportability, 8 USC 1429 on prerequisites to naturalization).

Another issue raised by @user4012 in the comments is that (some) people break law if chance of prosecuting is small, like jaywalking or smoking marijuana.

My response to it is: for both jaywalking and mj, benefit is immediate, personal and guaranteed. Benefit for illegal voting is delayed, impersonal, and unsure – so (IMHO) the temptation to break the law that specific way (illegal voting) is much lower. It is comparing apples to pencils.

  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. – Philipp Mar 30 '18 at 12:59
  • There is no likely prosecution. The DNC co-chair fetes cop killers, and he's running for the AG of MN. You think he would prosecute one of his own? –  Jul 19 '18 at 13:32
16

No.

But, if you are a non-citizen (either with or without a valid immigration status), and you register to vote, you are likely breaking two laws. One would be the state law concerning voter registration, and the other, federal immigration law (a non-citizen claiming to be a citizen). Both are rather serious crimes. The latter gets you deported rather quickly if you get caught.

Voter ID has nothing to do with verifying that the potential voter is authorized to vote (i.e., that he's a citizen). It only concerns itself with authenticating the identity of the voter (and to a lesser extent that he/she lives in the voting precinct).

Interestingly, voter ID laws are harder on born-in-the-USA citizens than they are on naturalized citizens. I paid a fortune (many hundreds of dollars) for my naturalization certificate. It's only a decade or so old - but I'm never going to lose it anyway. I'm in the habit of always having a passport handy (since I've been an immigrant so long). I have valid ID coming out of my ears. Contrast my situation with that of an 80-year-old woman who lost her birth certificate 50 years ago and her driver's license 5 years ago.

Flydog57
  • 1,516
  • 7
  • 14
  • 5
    I'm very glad you mentioned who voter ID laws tend to inconvenience. By any chance, when you start your answer with "No," do you know for a fact that no one screens the voter registrations after they're submitted? I feel like that's the crucial fact that is in debate here, and so far people are just guessing about whether there is a verification step or not. – cactus_pardner Mar 28 '18 at 03:41
  • 8
    Voter ID laws in the US tend to fall in the same category as poll taxes and grandfather clauses. Excuses to keep certain groups - minorities, typically - in fear and away from the polls. – MandisaW Mar 28 '18 at 15:20
  • 1
    Fleshing out my "No". The "Motor Voter" law (the National Voter Registration Act of 1993) is pretty specific that although registrants must swear ("under penalty of perjury") that they are a citizen, that states can't do much more that that. The Supreme Court (in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc.,) held those restrictions in place. I'm a "deputy voter registrar" in Texas, and I'm not supposed to ask for proof, just make sure they know that registrants understand what they are signing – Flydog57 Mar 29 '18 at 13:58
  • @Flydog57 Are those "don't ask" provisions intended to keep registrars from preferentially discriminating against potential voters? – jeffronicus Mar 30 '18 at 17:31
  • 1
    By "not supposed to ask", I didn't mean there was a list of things I was supposed to avoid. Instead, I meant, there's a list of things I'm supposed to do/ask, and that's not on it. Texas, by the way, is a voter-id state. – Flydog57 Mar 30 '18 at 21:23
15

TL;DR Nothing but personal honesty, but it seems that might be enough.


In Oregon you can register to vote with a utility bill, and all voting is by mail so might be expected to be one of the most vulnerable to fraud.

There is of course the threat of a big fine and jail for registering falsely, but it appears that is not actually a major factor. Oregon does have some systems for detecting fraud, but does not appear to have a path to checking citizenship[work needed].

Oregon does not consider this a problem, and lacking evidence of a serious issue, chooses to prioritize inclusion and a commitment to making voting easier.

8

I live in Seattle WA and attend my monthly 36th District Democrats meetings and was a PCO (precinct committee officer) for several election cycles. As an org we routinely run voter registration drives, which focus on photo ID methods (drivers licenses in WA do not require proof of citizenship) to verify name & eligibility and to check that they are not currently on the rolls in another county (many people can't remember). If they don't have a drivers license, they can supply the last 4 digits of a SSN. The person also signs a field on the form confirming they are a US citizen in WA state. Once registered voting is done by mail in WA.

We are volunteers and eager to signup Democrats, are generally pretty trusting and aren't especially focused on strict verification at county fairs and various public venues. Not saying we knowingly register non-citizens, but we give people the benefit of the doubt when they sign the voter registration form attesting to their citizenship status.

I have however, seen political training videos from other states where canvassers are paid to go door-to-door to sign up new voters and this worries me. They ask a resident living in the neighborhood questions, help fill out the voter registration form and then have the new voter sign it. In my opinion this has the potential to reward abuse by the paid canvasser. In one video the conversations are mostly in Spanish so it is hard to me to judge if the new voter is being misled by the paid canvasser, but I think there could be instances where a non-citizen new voter thinks or might even be told they are doing the right thing, not knowing the canvasser is paid to sign them up regardless. That is where I believe problems might originate: even if canvassers are not paid by the number of voters signed up (though maybe they might), those that turn in a decent tally of new voters are insuring they will continue to be paid to canvass, perhaps get paid a bonus ... etc.

phoog
  • 17,829
  • 3
  • 58
  • 81
  • 4
    If anyone is skeptical about the last paragraph, think how well such incentives worked out for Wells Fargo. Humans respond to incentives - and not always the way you wish or expect. – user4012 Mar 27 '18 at 16:16
  • @Mark-in-Seattle I appreciate the in-depth answer about what you've experienced. Do you have a contact you could ask about what the registrar of voters does with the information you collect? Even when signatures are collected to put a measure on the ballot, they are audited in some way, and that is less critical of an issue than signing someone up to vote. I suspect that there is additional screening done, and that seems to be the crux of the issue. – cactus_pardner Mar 28 '18 at 03:39
  • 1
    While this is an interesting story, it does not really directly answer the question. Could you add a paragraph which directly addresses the question ("What prevents a non-citizen from registering?"). If I read you correctly, the answer is: "In my experience, there are no checks for citizenship". – sleske Mar 28 '18 at 07:32
  • "driver's licenses in WA do not require proof of citizenship": no US jurisdiction issues driver's licenses only to US citizens. – phoog May 02 '22 at 00:54
7

No. In NYC, you can download, print, and mail in your voter registration form, and just lie on it.

http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/Download/voting/voteform.pdf

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

I don't know how often this actually occurs.


Now non-citizens can register to vote in San Francisco.

https://www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/article215095600.html

San Francisco began registering non-citizens, including undocumented immigrants, to register to vote Monday in the November election for the city school board


Localities have allowed non-citizens to vote for centuries.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/26/noncitizen-voting-push-liberal-jurisdictions-draws/

Famously liberal Takoma Park, a small jurisdiction in Maryland that abuts the District of Columbia, has long allowed noncitizens, including illegal immigrants, to vote in local elections. About 10 other Maryland jurisdictions have followed suit. And Chicago also allows noncitizen voting in its school elections.

Going back to the nation’s founding, as many as 40 states or territories have allowed noncitizen voting, according to Ron Hayduk, a political scientist at San Francisco State University.

During the country’s early years, being a male property holder was a more important question than citizenship status, Mr. Hayduk said.

The reasons the practice faded vary, Mr. Hayduk said. In New England, fears of French radicals escaping the French Revolution prompted a crackdown. The War of 1812 saw another rollback, as did the surge of immigration from southern and eastern European countries around the dawn of the 20th century.

“It really does boil down to these questions around who’s considered a member, a legitimate member of the polity,” he said.

Mr. Hayduk and Stanley Renshon, a political science professor at the City University of New York Graduate Center, said the push for noncitizen voting comes and goes.

Chloe
  • 6,028
  • 4
  • 26
  • 50
  • 6
    Voter registration applications are compared against multiple other government databases, from Federal (Social Security) to State (DMV) to local (School district & property tax rolls). Submitting fraudulent info doesn't translate to fraudulent registration - no more than providing a random string or number gets you access to bank accounts. – MandisaW Mar 28 '18 at 15:25
  • 4
    @MandisaW - source of your assertion? Especially source that explicitly confirms checing citizenship status against any such databases. – user4012 Mar 28 '18 at 16:07
  • 3
    @MandisaW How will they check with only the last 4 digits of a SSN, or none at all? Many people in NYC don't have a driver's license. Most people in NYC rent, and will not be on property tax rolls. – Chloe Mar 28 '18 at 18:01
  • 1
    @Chloe, @ user4012 Read the section titled "Verifying your Identity". While many New Yorkers do not drive, many do have other forms of State-issued photo ID, or other government documentation. If you don't have a DMV #, you have to provide something verifying your identity. – MandisaW Apr 05 '18 at 15:39
  • 1
    Also, people making this "anyone can say anything" argument keep forgetting that making a false affidavit is a serious crime, punishable by jail time and major fines. For non-citizens, it's also an automatic justification for deportation. – MandisaW Apr 05 '18 at 15:41
  • 1
    Yeah, you can lie on it, but when it is checked against the verifiable identification information that is asked for, your registration would get kicked. It's not the lying part that would be worrisome, it would be the getting away with it, which is not all that simple. – PoloHoleSet Jul 19 '18 at 21:04
  • 1
    "Most people in NYC rent, and will not be on property tax rolls": furthermore, property tax rolls don't have citizenship data, so it's not possible to determine from someone's being on the rolls that the person is a qualified voter. @MandisaW I frankly doubt that they check the DMV database. "Verify your identity" simply means confirming that the name, birthdate, and so on given on the form actually describe the person who signed the form. – phoog Dec 10 '21 at 11:54
  • 1
    @PoloHoleSet do they in fact check? In Texas, a state with stricter controls than New York, a permanent resident was deported because she wrongly believed she was authorized to vote. Had anyone checked any of these records that supposedly help to identify noncitizens registering to vote, they would have caught this before she voted. – phoog Dec 10 '21 at 11:55
  • @phoog - Seems like the individual did get caught. Is preventing one or two shady votes after instead of before going to help to keep an election legit? You're talking about what amounts to a non-event, statistically. That's why it's so stupid to focus on this part instead of election fraud. It's the least efficient, impossible to make an impact, most easily catchable way to try to swing an election, and if we're talking about "integrity," the primary end goal is integrity of results. – PoloHoleSet Dec 15 '21 at 14:11
  • @PoloHoleSet she got caught, but not because of any database searches. She was caught because she submitted a voter registration form indicating that she was not a US citizen. This led to closer scrutiny and eventually to prosecution when it came to light that she had voted previously in a different voting district. See https://www.huffpost.com/entry/texas-voter-fraud-prison_n_5c01a9afe4b0a173c02305c1. I haven't seen any evidence that any state actually checks databases to attempt to determine whether people registering to vote are in fact citizens. – phoog Dec 15 '21 at 14:37
  • @phoog - so you're using, as "proof" that systems aren't checked someone who slipped through the system about 20 years ago, as evidence that systems aren't in place, today, to try and verify? Really? And, let's be completely honest - it's not like Texas is a state where they like to invest in government bureaucracies in order to make government as capable as possible in carrying out their duties. If this is your example of how the system doesn't work, it really doesn't raise any concerns about the potential for mass fraud swinging elections. – PoloHoleSet Dec 15 '21 at 15:37
  • @phoog - In Wisconsin, for instance, you have to provide a DL or state ID card number, or SS# and proof of residency documentation in order to register. You can't register without that unique, checkable and verifiable number. If you "haven't seen any evidence," it's because you're not particularly interested in finding it. – PoloHoleSet Dec 15 '21 at 15:42
  • 1
    @PoloHoleSet (correction and expansion of previous comment): all of those documents are available to noncitizens, and none of it indicates that Wisconsin (a) checks any databases, or (b) if they do, whether it's possible to verify citizenship from the data in the database. Also, if you have no DL, ID, or social security number, "you will be able to indicate that fact," so these documents are not actually required for voting; you're just required to give one of these numbers if you are able to. US citizens without SSN are very rare, but they do exist. I'm still looking for evidence. – phoog Dec 15 '21 at 19:46
  • @phoog - While you can get a DL as a non-citizen, the DMV tracks the citizenship status of everyone issued a license. You don't just have to show that you have the DL, but you have to provide the actual DL number, and administrative rules show that they do an electronic inquiry with the DMV. Also, every other state agency with citizenship requirements do a SSN + birthdate check against the SSA database to verify. – PoloHoleSet Dec 17 '21 at 16:48
  • 1
    @PoloHoleSet what administrative rules? Do you have a link? I don't believe that NY DMV, issuer of my US driver's license, knows my nationality. But, once again, even if the registrar verifies the DL number with the DMV, and I don't doubt that they do this, that doesn't establish that they are checking whether the license was issued to a US citizen. And again, there is evidence that they don't: noncitizens register. You wrote "your registration would get kicked." How many such dejections are there? How do you explain noncitizens registering? The checks you imagine must not be happening. – phoog Dec 17 '21 at 23:23
6

It might be easy to do, but there is no evidence that it happens.

On the other hand, there is a lot of evidence that voter ID laws reduce turn out. It is very difficult for some people to get documents.

Legal and illegal aliens have a lot at stake in their residency here.They are often supporting their extended families back home. Why would they risk deportation to affect the American political system? In order to make a real difference, there would have to be a big mobilization effort which would surely be detected.

Michael
  • 61
  • 1
4

TL;DR: The strict answer to the question "Is anything preventing non-US citizens from illegally registering to vote in non-Voter-ID states?" is "no". But if you asked "Is anything preventing non-US citizens from illegally registering to vote in Voter-ID states?", then the answer to the question is still (basically) "no".

This is because of the 2013 Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona (decided 7–2, with Thomas & Alito dissenting). In the 1993 Voter Registration Act, Congress empowered the federal government to set out a voter registration procedure for federal elections, and required that states must accept voter registrations made via this procedure. States may also develop their own voter registration procedures so long as the requirements for registration are the same as those for the federal procedure. The only states that are exempt from this requirement are those states that do no require registration for federal elections, or allow voter registration on election day.

The 2013 Supreme Court decision found that in particular, this means that the states may not require any additional documentation for voter registration beyond what is required by the federal regulations. The federal voter registration procedure only requires "proof of identity", meaning a photo ID and a proof of residency. It also requires an oath of citizenship under penalty of perjury, but does not require any further documentation of one's citizenship. One can therefore register to vote in federal elections in any state without providing a physical proof of citizenship, just by swearing an oath.

One final detail: I did say that the answer to the question is still "basically" no. The exception is Arizona, which apparently operates a two-tiered system: you must provide proof of citizenship to vote in state elections, but you can register to vote in federal elections using the federal form. Alabama and Georgia have laws that allow such a two-tiered system as well, but they have not implemented them.

Michael Seifert
  • 1,955
  • 1
  • 17
  • 21
0

Short answer:

No because fraudulent information on a form will be checked against a database and identified as fraudulent and fail to successfully register that person to vote. You can certainly fill out the paperwork, but nothing will result from that. In fact, non-citizens do this all the time. There are numerous reasons why, but the primary 2 reasons are that DMV paperwork is extremely complicated and convoluted with tons of redundancy (eg you fill out all of your information multiple times) AND its very common for people to try to fill out every last box on the form in order to avoid getting sent to the back of the line because they missed something.

Long version:

Filling out a piece of paper fraudulently at the DMV and giving it to a person or dropping it into a pile results in your registration does not work.

Go to the DMV. Fraudulently fill out the paperwork with a fake/made up name, and a fake/made up SSN (or any combination of real/made up or even stolen).

Give that paper to a person, drop it in a stack, and walk out. You have just registered to vote as a non-citizen. Success!

No. Your piece of paper now sits in a pile. After a day, or a week, or a month someone from the DMV takes a big stack of papers and starts entering that information into a computer. When they get to your piece of paper they start typing that information into the computer and it fails either because the name does not match the SSN (or the last 4 of the SSN) or because the real name/SSN (or last 4) has already been registered. This is because that computer inside your DMV office is connected to a server at another facility operated by the state DMV and/or the state elections office that matches the information to known SSNs.

So your fraudulent ID form filled out solely for voter registration fails.

  • 2
    The SSN lookup will specify non-citizen – Joe Mar 27 '18 at 16:17
  • 5
  • Do you have any proof that this happens considering that California officially allows non-citizens to register to vote, since they are eligible to vote in local elections (which basically proves this entire answer 100% wrong as a concept).
  • – user4012 Mar 27 '18 at 16:18
  • @ChrisStratton - first of all, Proposition N – user4012 Mar 27 '18 at 19:23
  • 4
    @user4012 "if you are not a citizen, your ballot will not have federal, state, or other local or district contests, because non-citizens are not eligible to vote in these contests. The ballot for non-citizens will include the contest for Board of Education only." http://sfgov.org/elections/frequently-asked-questions-non-citizen-voting-school-board-elections – Chris Stratton Mar 27 '18 at 19:54
  • @ChrisStratton - (1) Who and specifically how decides which voter gets which ballot at the polling station? (2) are they explicitly using different process to register non-citizens to vote vs citizens? (I suspect no, based on Brown's 2016 directive to register anyone getting a driving ID to vote, but I'm open to being proven wrong - see the question I asked today on main site). – user4012 Mar 27 '18 at 20:01
  • 2
    If you've ever worked with public voter list data, you know there are many fields in the database. Having one for eligibility category is trivial. And there's ample precedent for different ballots - in a state with closed primaries, at check in you are given a ballot specific to your party or directed to an appropriate machine booth. Also don't confuse DMV convenience registration with the specific localities allowing non-citizen parents to vote in board-of-ed elections - the special provision it isn't open to all non-citizens, only parents of school-aged children. – Chris Stratton Mar 27 '18 at 20:11
  • @ChrisStratton - sorry, didn't mean to confuse the two, but the specific criticism of auto-DMV process was that it was prone to add the risk of non-citizens/illegals being registered. As far as ballots - where I live, nobody "gives" you ballots, nor checks any data aside from *just your name in a voter roll*, you go into a voting machine and punch buttons. I am guessing from your wording that CA is different? – user4012 Mar 27 '18 at 22:13
  • 5
    @user4012 - Yes, whenever I've voted in California, you either bring in the specific absentee ballot that was mailed to you or you show up at your polling place and receive a particular form of the ballot. (The info they mailed you has a short code number, or they look it up in the sign-in book.) This allows neighboring precincts (different city council districts or different school districts or something--jurisdictions never seem to line up logically) to share a polling place, or to allow for voting in party primaries. This system could easily be used for local vs. federal ballots, as well. – cactus_pardner Mar 28 '18 at 03:32
  • @cactus_pardner - OK. I'm not quite sure how that works, and if it's bullet proof. https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/29945/in-california-can-you-obtain-a-voting-ballot-on-your-own-initiative – user4012 Mar 28 '18 at 13:05
  • @user4012 bulletproof? In what sense? That someone might be given a paper ballot for the wrong precinct? That would be analogous to a person being sent to a voting machine for the wrong precinct, but with a twist, because the ballot paper has to be put in the box for the matching precinct. So the chance of voting in the wrong precinct is higher with a machine than with paper ballots. – phoog Jul 19 '18 at 22:42