2

The statement in the title of the question is in my lecture notes. I don't understand the reason for this.

Furthermore, I'm having trouble understanding what spin is in the first place. I know that for a fermion, which has spin 1/2, the wavefunction picks up a phase of $\pi$ under an "internal rotation" of $2 \pi$. Does this have anything to do with the above statement?

Lili FN
  • 234
  • 1
    Have you studied https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_theory_of_SU(2)? – Prahar Mar 24 '22 at 20:24
  • Yes, I am familiar with the group structure of SO(3) and SU(2) but what isn't "clicking" is how it connects to spin. – Lili FN Mar 24 '22 at 20:25
  • 1
    The half-integer $j$ which labels representations of $SU(2)$ is spin. – Prahar Mar 24 '22 at 20:26
  • Ok, thanks. But would you be able to give some insight into the physics of this? Why does the wavefunction have this property? – Lili FN Mar 24 '22 at 20:28
  • 1
    It seems to me that the problem is that you have some alternative definition/insight/intuition/guess for what spin is/might be and that definition is not fitting in with the one I provided here which is in terms of $SU(2)$ representations. Why don't you first tell me what is your insight on "spin" and I can help connect that insight to representations. – Prahar Mar 24 '22 at 20:30
  • Yes, I think I am struggling to bridge between my QMI and QMII course. My understanding was that "spin" is an internal degree of freedom of elementary particles. I've only really seen it in detail for fermions, where we learnt that spin was introduced to "explain" the Pauli exclusion principle, and we looked at the behaviour of particles with spin in magnetic fields, etc. Now, we introduced this from this very abstract POV of the wavefunction having this "spin" part which can be represented in these various ways, but I don't understand why it comes about physically or what it is intuitively. – Lili FN Mar 24 '22 at 20:39

1 Answers1

3

The Hilbert space for a single particle is $\mathcal H= L^2(\mathbb R^3)\otimes \mathcal H_{\text{internal}}$, where $\mathcal H_{\text{internal}}$ is a Hilbert space which describes the internal degrees of freedom. On $\mathcal H$, we need a unitary action of the group of isometries of $\mathbb R^3$, namely the semi-direct product $\mathbb R^3 \rtimes SO(3)$.

Isometries, angular momentum and spin

The translation group $\mathbb R^3$ acts in the usual way on $L^2(\mathbb R^3)$ and trivially on $\mathcal H_{\text{internal}}$. Physically, this means that the particle doesn't carry internal momentum, because the generators of translation are the momentum operators.

The rotation group acts in the usual way on $L^2(\mathbb R^3)$. It's action on $\mathcal H_{\text{internal}}$ is what defines spin. Physically, this means that the particle can carry some angular momentum internally, because the generators of rotation are angular momentum operators (see below). Now, because absolute phase isn't physical in quantum mechanics, we can allow the action to only be projective, ie $\mathcal H_{\text{internal}}$ is a representation of $SU(2)$.

We can also require this representation to be irreducible. (Mathematically, in non-relativistic QM, it is possible to have a particle which is allowed to be in a superposition of spin $0$ and spin $1/2$.)

Those irreducible representation are indexed by some number $s$ (integer or half-integer), in which case the dimension is $2s+1$. This is what we call spin.

Total angular momentum

For a rotation $R$, the unitary operator representing this symmetry on $\mathcal H$ is $U(R) = U_{L^2(\mathbb R^3)}(R)\otimes U_s (R)$ where the first factor is the usual rotation operator on wave functions and $U_s(R)$ is in the representation of spin $s$.

For infinitesimal $Rx \simeq x +\epsilon y\times x$, we have, by definition $U(R) = \mathbb I + i\epsilon y_k J_k$ where $J_k$ are the total angular momentum operators. In our case, we have : \begin{align} U_{L^2(\mathbb R^3)}(R) &\simeq \mathbb I + i\epsilon y_kL_k \\ U_s(R) &\simeq \mathbb I + i\epsilon y_k S_k \end{align} where $L_k$ are the usual orbital angular momentum operators and $S_k$ are the spin operators.

Matching both sides of $U(R) = U_{L^2(\mathbb R^3)}(R)\otimes U_s (R)$, we see that : $$J_k = L_k + S_k$$

In other words, the internal degrees of freedom of the particle allow it to carry some angular momentum.

Multi-component wave-functions $\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1\right\rangle} \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left\langle #1\right|} \newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left\langle #1 \middle|#2\right\rangle}\newcommand{\mel}[3]{\left\langle #1 \middle| #2 \middle|#3 \right\rangle}$

The position eigenstates $\ket x$ form a basis of $L^2(\mathbb R^3)$. For a general state $\ket \psi$, the wave function is defined as $\psi(x) = \braket{x}{\psi}$.

We take a basis $\ket k$ of the internal spin Hilbert space, where $k$ ranges from $-s$ to $s$ in integer steps, taking on $2s+1$ values. Assuming that there are no other internal degrees of freedom, a basis for the full Hilbert space is given by the $\ket x \otimes \ket k$. Given a state $\ket \psi$, we can therefore define $2s+1$ wave-functions (or a wave-function with $2s+1$ components) by :

$$\psi_k(x) = \left( \bra x \otimes \bra k\right) \ket \psi$$

Phase under a rotation of $2\pi$

The integer spin representation are single-valued : after a rotation of $2\pi$, the state is brought back to its initial value. For half-integer spin, the state picks up a minus sign after a rotation of $2\pi$. Given what we saw above, the same goes for the different components of the wave-function.

SolubleFish
  • 5,718