3

I want to be able to shoot video footage in the best quality I can of vibrating grains on membranes (cymatics).

I'm wondering if I should I swap my Canon 5D for a 5DmkII, buy the cheaper 7D, buy a different dSLR with video capabilities, or buy a good camcorder instead?

I am concerned that a camcorder wouldn't be able to get close up video of the cymatic phenomenon...

thomasrutter
  • 13,600
  • 2
  • 40
  • 53

3 Answers3

3

5D mkII is definitely overkill for what you're trying to do. It's main advantage for video is the shallow depth of field that a large sensor allows. For filming close objects a smaller sensor (APS-C) would be better as it gives you a little mote depth of field.

The 7D is also higher spec than you need. The 60D is the best price/video quality trade off for what you want. The older xxxD models are missing full HD recording at 24p, but the 550D t2i and 600D t3i do.

Matt Grum
  • 118,892
  • 5
  • 274
  • 436
1

Some DSLRs (like the 5DII and 7D) produce a rolling shutter effect which might be detrimental to filming these vibrations.

I am not sure which cameras would work the best for you, but you should keep this in mind when making your decision.

JoeGaggler
  • 333
  • 1
  • 3
  • 7
0

My advice would be to hire or borrow a 5Dmk2, 7D or 60D and see how the video recording looks.

The 60D or 7D is probably the way to go as they let you record at 60fps (at 1280x720) as well as 30fps at 1920x1080. The 5DmkII doesn't go above 30fps. Depending on what it is you're trying to record, a higher frame rate might actually be quite useful, especially if combined with a macro lens.

If this is the only thing you're using the camera for, just get the 60D (its articulated screen would be useful for recording macro video from awkward angles and it's slightly cheaper) but if you're going to be using it as a replacement for the 5D for photography as well, then the 7D might be a better choice (since it's not much more expensive).

drfrogsplat
  • 5,714
  • 2
  • 31
  • 57