-2

I am interested in photography at very very small distances (10 cm) which is why I'm thinking of using a 135mm. Does this justify buying a cheaper DSLR? Or do you have to spend big money on that too?

jiniyt
  • 101
  • 1
  • 5
    this question seems a complete non sequitur. small distance does not imply higher focal length, 135mm is not particularly high or expensive, and lens and camera prices are orthogonal. – ths Jun 03 '15 at 14:16

1 Answers1

3
  1. Short distance do not mean long focal length, check macro lenses, Canon have from 50 to 180mm macro lens
  2. Cheap DSLR+expensive lens usually provide better result than expensive DSLR+cheap lens
Romeo Ninov
  • 12,030
  • 4
  • 31
  • 49