49

What are some good undergraduate level books, particularly good introductions to (Real and Complex) Analysis, Linear Algebra, Algebra or Differential/Integral Equations (but books in any undergraduate level topic would also be much appreciated)?

EDIT: More topics (Affine, Euclidian, Hyperbolic, Descriptive & Diferential Geometry, Probability and Statistics, Numerical Mathematics, Distributions and Partial Equations, Topology, Algebraic Topology, Mathematical Logic etc)

Please post only one book per answer so that people can easily vote the books up/down and we get a nice sorted list. If possible post a link to the book itself (if it is freely available online) or to its amazon or google books page.

Harry Gindi
  • 19,374
person
  • 13
  • This is borderline, but I think it is a legitimate question of interest to math instructors. I think its better as a community wiki though. – David Zureick-Brown Oct 16 '09 at 17:28
  • 7
    It's no longer possible to add useful answers to this question (as there are too many!) and it's unclear whether this question would be "allowed" by modern standards -- far too broad. As it's been popping back to the front page fairly frequently, we've decided to close it. – Scott Morrison Jul 11 '10 at 13:30
  • 10
    See discussion on meta: http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/499/undergraduate-level-math-books-proposal-to-close/ (and remember to vote this comment up, so it is visible to others) – Victor Protsak Jul 14 '10 at 10:34
  • I don't have enough rep to rate anything and I only skimmed through the meta discussion but essentially what the mods did is bad for the website...

    Most websites start with one thing and then change their purpose by the will of the users... Otherwise they fail miserably as soon as some competition shows up...

    So the final judgment for closure "The system was created for people looking for precise answers to precise questions. Big list questions were an emergent phenomenon" is generally a flawed mindset.

    – person Jul 16 '10 at 23:19
  • I asked the question because I am an undergraduate student and want to learn more about math... A lot of great books were recommended here and I guess what was suggested so far is more then enough for me to read... So at this point I don't really care about the policies at MathOverflow but my friendly advice is given in the preceding comment...

    And NO I'm not gonna create a new account for meta just for one post ¬_¬

    – person Jul 16 '10 at 23:22
  • ..also I suggest a "Hide Question" option for users who are tired of seeing a question pop on the home page – person Jul 16 '10 at 23:24
  • Ordinary Differential Equations by Garrett Birkhoff and Gian-Carlo Rota. – Jeff Burdges Oct 17 '11 at 05:10

95 Answers95

28

Algebraic Topology by Hatcher (available online here).

Randomblue
  • 2,937
  • 2
    If you like print books (easier to carry around, scribble in, etc.), Hatcher's book sells for $37, which seems pretty reasonable. – Michael Lugo Oct 16 '09 at 20:12
26

Generatingfunctionology by Wilf is fun, free, requires very little in the way of prerequisites, and is as good an introduction to the methods of analytic combinatorics as could be asked for. It's long been one of my favorite textbooks.

  • 1
    The free edition is the second (early 1990s?); there's a third edition (2005), which as of now is not free. The third edition doesn't differ that much from the second one, though.

    For a more advanced book that massively expands upon Wilf, I recommend Flajolet and Sedgewick's Analytic Combinatorics, published 2009 (also available free online!) -- but this is really a graduate-level text.

    – Michael Lugo Oct 17 '09 at 05:11
24

Spivak, Calculus

Gerald Edgar
  • 40,238
  • 2
    I agree, with the caveat that the subject of the book is usually called "Elementary Real Analysis" these days.

    That said, when I first read this book I loved it so much that it made me want to be a mathematician. It's both rigorous AND intuitive, in a way that both qualities complement one another.

    – John Goodrick Oct 16 '09 at 21:46
24

Concrete Mathematics, Graham, Knuth and Patashnik. Extremely useful, very good exercises, and a sense of humor that appeals to me.

David E Speyer
  • 150,821
  • 2
    I finally gave in and bought this book last week, after realizing that at any given moment over the last few years I was more likely to have it checked out of the library than not. – Michael Lugo Oct 17 '09 at 05:04
23

A basic undergrad algebra book which I feel is not as well known as it should be is Michael Artin's Algebra. I have it in soft cover so I hope it's actually the one in this Amazon link. Anyway it's beautifully written, provides context and motivation and is just a pleasure to read or browse. How often do you find a basic text written by a world-class expert?

"Always study from the masters".

Alon Amit
  • 6,414
  • 2
    As far as I know there is only one book by Michael Artin with that title. I have the hardcover and it looks like the one you link to. Apparently Artin is working on a new edition. – Michael Lugo Nov 01 '09 at 17:15
  • 2
    That book is so much better than Dummit and Foote for undergraduates. D&F is also useless at the graduate level, where much better texts like Lang blow it out of the water. – Harry Gindi Nov 30 '09 at 12:16
  • 3
    Artin is going to be rough going for undergraduates who are not well versed in basic geometry and linear algebra,fpqc.But you can't help but love the infectious passion with which Artin weaves his craft in front of the students.He loves algebra and he's trying to prosyletize his students to it. A book with a similar geometric bent,level and also by a master that students will probably find easier going is E.B.Vinberg's A COURSE IN ALGEBRA. But Artin's book is very good and it's good news for all of us that Artin is revising it. – The Mathemagician Mar 27 '10 at 22:01
22

For undergraduate level topology (mostly point set topology) I recommend "Topology" by Munkres. I learned topology from this book as an undergrad and I remember this being one of my favorite books at the time.

GMRA
  • 2,050
  • I felt the same, it is great to read as an undergrad (I recommend students to try to do most of the proofs mentally instead of reading them). – Jose Brox Dec 21 '09 at 15:04
20

Milnor, Topology from the differentiable viewpoint.

Dmitri Pavlov
  • 36,141
  • A variant that many prefer over Milnor would be Guillemin and Pollack's Differential Topology. – Ryan Budney Nov 06 '09 at 21:26
  • @Ryan. It's a matter of taste, of course. Milnor does much less material that Guillemin and Pollack, but reading it was an amazing experience for me. Guillemin and Pollack is a very good book, but I never got nearly as much from it. – Ilya Grigoriev Jan 23 '10 at 07:09
  • 2
    No no no!! This book is awful as an undergraduate text! It's a great reference for someone who already knows the material, but the proofs skip many "simple" steps, and the author makes no attempt to explain the concepts from a intuitive point of view! Our professor assigned this book for the undergraduate course in Topology at SUNY Stony Brook, and at the time it was of absolutely no help to me whatsoever. – BlueRaja Jul 07 '10 at 04:31
18

Serre, A Course in Arithmetic.

Dmitri Pavlov
  • 36,141
16

Needham, Visual Complex Analysis. I read this while in high school, and it's simply beautiful. I recommend this book as a supplement to any first course in complex analysis (a different book should probably be used for the main textbook since Needham's is very pretty, very engaging, but not very rigorous).

Zach Conn
  • 269
16

The Chicago undergraduate mathematics bibliography is a nice annotated list of books.

Michael Lugo
  • 13,858
  • Our own Pete Clark is one of the authors of that list way back when he was an undergraduate there,I believe,Michael. – The Mathemagician Mar 18 '10 at 20:49
  • Pete's online CV has him graduating from Chicago in '98, so you're right (unless two mathematicians named Pete Clark came from Chicago in the same year!) – Michael Lugo Mar 18 '10 at 21:28
  • 2
    +1000 It was a GREAT idea to develop a database of critical reviews sorted by subject and difficulty level, a few of them by multiple people. Even if the list itself is somewhat obsolete, one gets a good feel of relative strengths and weaknesses of "canonical texts" ca 1998. – Victor Protsak May 24 '10 at 06:20
16

Ordinary Differential Equations by Vladimir I. Arnold

Max M
  • 804
16

Miles Reid, Undergraduate Algebraic Geometry.

ps - anyone who thinks one can teach an undergraduate class out of Hatcher's Algebraic Topology (which is a great book) at more than 10 universities in the US is sadly deluded. Ditto for a few more things I've seen here.

pps - somewhere between a third and half of the math majors here could handle abstract algebra out of Artin. It would be great for those that could, but we're not going to ditch half our students.

15

Not exactly one of the topics in the question, but I particularly liked Silverman and Tate's Rational Points on Elliptic Curves.

14

Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, by Manfredo Do Carmo is an excellent introductory book.

https://www.amazon.com/Differential-Geometry-Curves-Surfaces-Manfredo/dp/0132125897

AgCl
  • 2,675
12

Complex Analysis, by Lars Ahlfors

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lars_Ahlfors

Andrea
  • 1
  • 2
    It is a complete mystery to me why people are still using this monstrosity. Actually,it's not-it's because Ahlfors was a God at Harvard and they're afraid of being struck down by lightening using anything else.I can think of at least a half a dozen texts now that are better then this one. – The Mathemagician Mar 18 '10 at 20:42
  • 3
    I'm not a huge fan of this book, either... – Qiaochu Yuan May 25 '10 at 06:32
  • 2
    'Elementary Theory of Analytic Functions of One or Several Complex Variables' by Cartan is a far superior text. – Saikat Biswas May 10 '11 at 23:51
  • @TheMathemagician, which books would you recommend instead of Ahlfors? – FNH Dec 24 '17 at 23:41
  • 1
    @FawzyHegab The most up-to-date,complete and user-friendly text on the subject that exists is COMPLEX ANALYSIS by Theodore Gamelin. Requiring only a background in nonrigorous calculus,the book brings one from the basics of complex numbers through analytic functions through differential and integral complex calculus to graduate level topics like Julia and Mandelbrot sets and Runge's theorem. It also includes many applications to geometry and physics, such as Euclidean mappings and fluid dynamics. It also has a several discussions of Riemann surfaces.at different levels. An outstanding book. – The Mathemagician Dec 25 '17 at 06:07
12

The Princeton Lectures in Analysis by Stein and Shakarchi are great introductions to Fourier, complex, and real analysis (in that order!).

Qiaochu Yuan
  • 114,941
11

Real and Complex Analysis by W. Rudin is a beautiful and extremely well written book which presents the fundamentals of real and complex analysis highlighting the interactions between different results and ideas.

  • 8
    I'm all for "adult rudin"... but undergraduate? I don't see it. Have you seen it used at the undergraduate level? – Michael Hoffman Oct 30 '09 at 13:28
  • 5
    Actually, Rudin has an undergraduate-level book also, the "small Rudin". I learned from it, and it was fine. I loathe the big Rudin, though, even for graduate level. I never managed to learn anything from it; I especially hated the way every proof refers to a million previous results as "Lemma 12.1.8" without mentioning what they actually are. As a result, reading anything required flipping through the whole book after every line just to know what he is talking about. – Ilya Grigoriev Jan 23 '10 at 07:16
  • 1
    I don't like either Rudin particularly,to be honest.Adult Rudin tries to put too much into one book.Folland is the same level and is just so much more pleasant to read. – The Mathemagician Mar 18 '10 at 20:44
  • Adult Rudin is used for (3rd year) undergraduates at Cambridge. – user85798 Jun 24 '14 at 21:59
11

Spivak, A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry. There is a nice geometrical philosophy and plenty of motivation.

Akhil Mathew
  • 25,291
  • 3
    Especially the newer version which is typeset in LaTeX! The typesetting of the older version is still charming in its own ugly way, though. Also, I'm not sure if Spivak should count as an undergraduate level book... – Kevin H. Lin Dec 28 '09 at 15:24
10

As an undergraduate, I loved Shafarevich's book Basic notions of algebra. This is not a textbook, but gives small beautiful tastes of a broad choice of topics in algebra, emphasizing connections with other fields.

I found it very stimulating, in the sense that every example or overview of some topic in this book made me want to learn more details about it. In fact I became interested in algebraic geometry because of this book.

10

Guillemin and Pollack, "Differential Topology"

Deane Yang
  • 26,941
  • Even with the tons of good introductions to differentiable manifolds available these days,Deane-this is STILL one of the very best and well worth the money. – The Mathemagician Mar 27 '10 at 21:51
10

Topics in Algebra by I. N. Herstein. A new edition will be coming out this year.

10

Dummit and Foote's Abstract Algebra is an excellent book for learning group theory, ring theory, and module theory. There's also a section on basic algebraic geometry and homological algebra.

  • Galois theory is also covered quite extensively. The Algebraic Geometry section doesn't discuss Projective varieties, so I don't recommend it for AlGeo. However, the problems are ample so also counter-examples. – Abhishek Parab May 26 '10 at 04:17
  • From what I've read so far it really is a great book, and the fact that it covers such a major part of basic abstract algebra makes it even greater. – Pandora Jul 10 '10 at 21:40
10

I didn't see any suggested books from the great Russian school of mathematics, here is a brief list of superb, well written, example oriented books:

  • Elements of the Theory of Functions and Functional Analysis by A. N. Kolmogorov and S. V. Fomin
  • Theory of Functions of a Real Variable by I. P. Natanson (this I think, it's hard to find)
  • Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable, Second Edition (3 vol. set) by A. I. Markushevich
  • Elements of Functional Analysis by L.A. Lusternik and V.J. Sobolev
  • Problems in Mathematical Analysis by B. Demidovich
  • Calcul intégral et differentiel (2 vol. set) by N. Piskounov. In English should be something like Differential and Integral Calculus
  • A Course of Mathematical Analysis (2 vol. set ) S. Nikols'skii
  • Differentialrechnung und Integralrechnung (3 vol. set), by Gregor M. Fichtenholz. Unfortunately, there is no English translation of this book, only the German translation that it's mentioned. I think this was THE calculus book on Russia. THIS BOOK SHOULD BE TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH, and I suspect that there is no copyright, it appears around 1959 I think.
  • Mathematical Analysis (2 vol. set) by Vladimir A. Zorich. This is a very recent book from a great mathematician which is in Moscow university. The book is based upon is lecture.

I have also found a Spanish translation of a book written by S. Banach about "Differential and integral calculus". It is very good as an undergraduate book. The spanish translation (for those who want to search) is Calculo diferencial e integral

Books that undergraduate should not touch (in my humble opinion) are books written in bourbaki's style.

10

Ireland and Rosen, A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory is a great second course in number theory. In spite of being part of "Graduate Texts in Mathematics" series and unlike Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (see a comment above), this is a book at the undergraduate level. It only presupposes undergraduate algebra as in Herstein Topics in Algebra or M. Artin's Algebra, undergraduate analysis like in Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis and basic number theory. In fact it recalls or proves many of the necessary results in each of those fields. A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory bridges the gap between basic number theory (that covers modular arithmetic, Fermat's little theorem and QR) and books like Lang's Algebraic Number Theory or Cassels and Fröhlich.

user7361
  • 156
9

I am surprised no one has mentioned Halmos' Naive Set Theory or Finite-Dimensional Vector Spaces or Rudin's Principles of Mathematcal Analysis. There's also Sheldon Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right and Royden's Real Analysis.

sdcvvc
  • 928
8

For discrete mathematics, I would recommend Van Lint-Wilson's "A Course in Combinatorics" as a good introductory text. It consists of 38 (in my edition) chapters that give (often largely self-contained) introductions to various areas of the field. Although it doesn't go nearly as in depth as, say, Stanley's "Enumerative Combinatorics" or a text focused solely on graph theory, I found it excellent for giving a broad overview and indicating to me where I wanted to explore deeper.

My one caveat would be that some chapters require background in either linear algebra or basic group theory, though those are easily skippable due to the structure of the book.

8

Basic Algebra by Jacobson.

lhf
  • 2,942
7

General geometry: Coxeter, Introduction to Geometry.

Not so much a textbook as a collection of essays (in particular, it doesn't have exercises), but all of the essays are instructive and enlightening.

6

I am surprised this has not been mentioned before (is it too advanced?):

Bott and Tu, Differential forms in algebraic topology.

The best introduction to de Rham cohomology, spectral sequences, characteristic classes from the algebraic point of view, and countless other topics.

  • 2
    Certainly true,but unless your undergraduates are in Germany or at Harvard,that book is definitely too tough for this list. – The Mathemagician May 25 '10 at 04:14
  • 1
    Hey, I was an undergraduate in Moscow. Does that count? – Victor Protsak May 25 '10 at 04:27
  • 2
    ... and seeing that Hatcher, Serre, Jacobson, Alperin, and Evans have been featured (some at the very top), I don't agree that it's "too tough for this list". – Victor Protsak May 25 '10 at 04:33
  • 1
    Yes-and with the POSSIBLE exception of Hatcher,none of them belong on a general reading list for undergraduates,Victor. You studied in a VERY strong program and you need to be a bit more mindful of that when making such lofty aspairations for mere mortals.And that goes for quite a few people in here. – The Mathemagician May 25 '10 at 11:55
6

Algebra: Chapter 0, Paolo Aluffi

Best book on algebra I've had my hands on yet, and I love how it uses category theory. I wouldn't mind having a course taught from this one. Topics from group theory all the way through field theory, linear algebra, and homology. This book deserves more attention!

https://www.amazon.com/Algebra-Chapter-Graduate-Studies-Mathematics/dp/0821847813/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1278799249&sr=8-1

6

Ok, this is not a single book, but I have often found books from the Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series (SUMS) to be excellent. Here is a list of titles.

6

Another one I like is "An introduction to Lie algebras." by Erdmann and Wildon.

GMRA
  • 2,050
6

Galois Theory by Ian Stewart is excellent. The third edition is quite different from the second and includes many more problems.


5

Jaenich: "Topology"

Introduces the concepts of point set topology ("paracompact" and all this stuff) motivating each via examples which are rigorously defined but also drawn. Other advantage: It is short!

Peter Arndt
  • 12,033
5

Apostol "Calculus"

Shake Baby
  • 1,638
5

Bartle "The Elements of Integration and Lebesgue Measure"

Shake Baby
  • 1,638
  • Excellent book, especially for an undergrad course. One of my favorite parts of the book was his diagrams for modes of convergence: http://www.johndcook.com/modes_of_convergence.html – John D. Cook Jul 10 '10 at 21:10
5

Searcóid: Elements of Abstract Analysis. I loved this book as an undergraduate, for many reasons, but mainly because it gave me an idea of the unity of mathematics. It starts from the axioms of set theory and takes you all the way to C*-algebras and the Gelfand-Naimark theorem. Here's the Google Books page.

  • The name is actually "Ó Searcóid" (cf. names like O'Grady, which are Anglicised versions of the same form).

    Anyway, nice choice

    –  May 25 '10 at 07:07
5

I'm a big fan of John Hubbard's "Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra and Differential Forms" text. I was a TA for the course twice at Cornell and was amazed at how well it went. The text has an extremely pleasant "zest" to it. When Hubbard asked me to take a look at it my first response was the text is "overflowing with the spirit of calculus". I still believe that. I have a hard time containing my praise.

The main problem with the text is that it's so engrossing. It places more demands on the student than a traditional service course text would ever consider. But it's also far more rewarding. At Cornell it was taught as a branch of their traditional calculus sequence -- it was a course that was earmarked for keener students, mostly from other departments.

In short, if you want to have physics, engineering and economics students appreciating the derivative as a linear approximation, thinking Lipschitz bounds for functions are cool, being interested in the computation of norms of linear operators, etc, this is a great resource.

Ryan Budney
  • 43,013
  • There are "undergraduate" texts that are so deep with ideas and concepts that anyone of any level can learn from them. Books like this are Spivak's classic "Calculus On Manfolds",Janich's "Topology",Hoffman's "Analysis In Euclidean Space" and more recently McCleary's "A First Course In Topology:Continuity And Dimension". Hubbard and Hubbard CERTAINLY belongs in that select group. – The Mathemagician Mar 18 '10 at 20:31
  • John Hubbard is DA MAN!!! – Victor Protsak May 24 '10 at 06:05
5

Karen Smith et al., An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry

  • 1
    Since I haven't looked at this book but might be interested...

    This book is "undergraduate level" for whom? Presumably, many Harvard senior math majors would be able to tackle it. How many senior math majors at a mid-tier public research university? mid-tier liberal arts college? compass point state college?

    – Alexander Woo Dec 28 '09 at 21:23
  • (off-topic comment deleted) – S. Carnahan Aug 11 '10 at 13:45
4

Fraleigh's "A First Course in Abstract Algebra"

https://www.amazon.com/First-Course-Abstract-Algebra-7th/dp/0201763907

diab
  • 81
  • 1
  • 6
4

Visual Complex Analysis by Tristan Needham is awesome!

4

Linear Algebra / Hoffman & Kunze - A book that truly develops linear algebra in a gradual manner. It starts with a basic discussion of systems of linear equations, matrices, Gaussian elimination, etc. and gradually progresses to the more abstract theory. Eventually it even touches upon subjects such as tensor products, the exterior algebra and the Grassmann ring. In short, it manages to cover a lot of linear algebra in a very leisurely and clear manner. I think that this is the quintessential example of a how an undergraduate level math book should be written. The only thing I don't like about it is the fact that quotient spaces aren't mentioned throughout the book (they're mentioned in the appendix, though).

Mark
  • 4,804
  • I'd LOVE to teach a one year honors course in linear algebra using the union of both H&K and Strang. A truly balanced course that shows how both aspects of the subject-theory and applications-are equally important. – The Mathemagician Jul 11 '10 at 00:30
4

For a thorough introduction on Partial Differential Equations, read L.C. Evans, "Partial Differential Equations". Features both linear and nonlinear equations.

Martijn
  • 310
  • that book is very good.

    For a 1st or 2nd year undergraduate, perhaps a slightly more accessible book is Haberman - "Applied Partial Differential equations"; admitted it is "applied", but it overlaps heavily with pure PDEs and has many "pure" techniques.

    – Puraṭci Vinnani Dec 21 '09 at 04:57
  • Evan's is a great GRADUATE level text. Most undergraduates would be like,"huh?" A much better choice is the long out of print Robert L.Street's "Analysis And Solution Of Partial Differential Equations". – The Mathemagician Mar 18 '10 at 20:34
  • @Andrew L: while the book is clearly meant for graduate students, it is also suitable for undergrads, especially the first chapters (and omitting the "omit on first reading" parts). With appropriate supervision, even some of the nonlinear chapters can be read by undergrads. – Martijn Mar 23 '10 at 07:37
  • @Martijn,those would have to be VERY good undergraduates indeed and you'd have to be REALLY selective with it. – The Mathemagician Mar 27 '10 at 21:48
  • That's quite a hefty book. I think undergrads would be better served by covering a less ambitious book rather than not getting very far into Evans. – John D. Cook Jul 10 '10 at 21:12
4

Real Mathematical Analysis by Charles Pugh

Max M
  • 804
  • 1
    Thank you,someone finally mentioned this book.I'm hoping it supplants baby Rudin eventually.I affectionally call it "Rudin Done Right". – The Mathemagician Mar 18 '10 at 20:47
4

Lectures on Linear Algebra by I. M. Gel'fand

Max M
  • 804
4

Also, I just started this book and absolutely love it

Geometry: Euclid and Beyond, Hartshorne

4

For a long time, Kolmogorov-Fomin's Introductory Real Analysis was my standard for a great mahtematics textbook. I can't imagine a better introduction to serious analysis.

The translation I'm linking to is very good, and includes excercises (the original has many fewer), but it is incomplete (it's missing the chapter on Fourier Series). So if you can read Russian, I recommend you get the original.

  • You know,it's interesting you should approve so strongly of the Silverman translation of the Kolomogrov/Fomin text,Ilya. A lot of Russian mathematicians I've brought it up to tell me Silverman should be hanged for ruining such a classic.Guess you can't please everyone. – The Mathemagician Mar 28 '10 at 05:26
4

From the quick look I've had, not much representation theory has been mentioned so here goes for undergrad level rep theory (perhaps suitable for 3rd/4th year in a standard sequence of undergraduate study), roughly in the order of difficulty (from easiest to hardest):

  • James & Liebeck - "Representations and Characters of Groups" (a very good introduction)

  • Sagan - "The symmetric group: representations, combinatorial algorithms, and symmetric functions"; (the first two chapters here at least are representation theory) OR James & Kerber - "Representation Theory of the Symmetric Group" (this one includes some modular representations of $S_n$)

  • Alperin - "Local Representation Theory" (basically, modular representation theory)

  • Hall - "Lie groups, Lie Algebras and Representation Theory" (a solid introduction to Lie theory); for a more advanced perspective Harris & Fulton - "Representation Theory: A first course" (but it could be slightly terse at points, but not necessarily)

For algebraic geometry, the one book I'd suggest is "Algebraic Geometry: A first course" by Joe Harris, very nice and full of examples. For algebraic number theory, a very good introduction is Janusz - "Algebraic Number Fields" (followed perhaps by Childress - "Class Field Theory", or Silverman - "The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves" to go in a slightly different direction).

4

Here is an undergraduate level math book recommendation from an early undergrad's position:

I like "Linear Algebra Done Right". I've looked at a bunch of books on linear algebra, and the usual matrix approach is to me a big turn-off when what you're really interested in is the abstract machinery of transformations between vector spaces. I'm not a research mathematician. In fact, I don't even study linear algebra yet, but as a student of mathematics that like algebra, spaces, maps and all that good stuff, I find this to be a very readable account of linear algebra.

There are more abstract books on the subject, and my impression is that LADR prepares you for the next level way before you're usually "allowed to" by other accounts like Lax etc. The trade-off is that LADR is not a book for engineers, but this would be a sad world for a mathematician if that was something he had to worry about (in his spare time). Great for self-study. Reads like a novel. I'd probably prefer it if Axler used sets for span and bases instead of lists, but that's something you'll probably be able to shake off with the next book you read on the subject.

  • 1
    See the other answer on this book for my comments. – Gerald Edgar Dec 28 '09 at 15:24
  • I'm not sure I agree your comments warrants a vote-down for this one. I still think it's a good book (for people who wants to learn mathematics for the benefit of mathematics), and my position for what I want the book to do is clear and I think it accomplishes it. – Eivind Dahl Dec 28 '09 at 15:43
3

An Introduction to Manifolds by Loring W. Tu

https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Manifolds-Universitext-Loring-W/dp/0387480986/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256082981&sr=1-1

Kim Greene
  • 3,583
  • 10
  • 42
  • 41
3

Riemannian Geometry: A Beginner's Guide by Frank Morgan

https://www.amazon.com/Riemannian-Geometry-Beginners-Frank-Morgan/dp/1568810733/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256083041&sr=1-1

I love this book!

Kim Greene
  • 3,583
  • 10
  • 42
  • 41
3

Lebesgue Integration on Euclidean Space / Frank Jones - an extremely readable book on Lebesgue theory on $\mathbb{R}^n$ (lots of figures and geometric intuition). He constructs Lebesgue measure in a very down-to-earth manner, much more explicitly than other more abstract constructions (via Caratheodory's extension theorem or Riesz's representation theorem). In my experience, it's best to first study Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb{R}^n$ and only then point out that it's merely one instance of the general theory of measures, which is the way this book is written. It can't compare with the "tougher" books on measure theory (e.g. Big Rudin) since it doesn't discuss the Radon-Nikodym theorem and many other important theorems in measure theory, but then again the book is clearly intended for an undergraduate audience, and as for Lebesgue theory on Euclidean spaces, it provides a pretty complete picture.

Mark
  • 4,804
  • One of the best introductions to the subject out there. Should be on everyone's must-read list and great collateral reading with the more intense introductions like Big Rudin or Folland. – The Mathemagician Jul 11 '10 at 00:29
3

Subject: FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS

Erwin Kreyszig

Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications

Andrea
  • 1
3

E. Hairer, G. Wanner: Analysis by its history for an introduction to real and numerical analysis from a historical point of view.

kweinert
  • 208
3

Kock, Vainsencher: An invitation to Quantum Cohomology.

Written in the most friendly and motivating style I have ever seen in a book. Almost has no prerequisites: You should that there exists something like algebraic varieties - without having to know any technical details - and that P^1 is such a thing. Everything else is provided in easy exercises or the text. It gives an excellent intuition about the subject with lots of outlooks on a field of current research, and at the same time manages to be easily undergraduate readable.

Peter Arndt
  • 12,033
3

Alexandre Stefanov keeps an extensive list (Wayback Machine, another link) of free math books / lecture notes. The list is divided according to subject and updated frequently. I have found some very nice books there.

2

Linear Algebra and Its Applications by Gilbert Strang. You can also watch his video lectures at MIT OpenCourseWare

2

"Introduction to Mathematical Logic" by Ebbinghaus, Flum and Thomas

Careful introduction, addresses many doubts that one might have about why one does logic in this way and not some other, e.g. whether one is doing something circular when formulating set theory in 1st order logic, or e.g. it proves Lindstroem's Theorem, that says that classical 1st order logic has the highest power of expressability among the logics with completeness and Loewenheim-Skolem.

Peter Arndt
  • 12,033
2

Metric Spaces by Mícheál Ó Searcóid

https://www.amazon.com/Metric-Spaces-Springer-Undergraduate-Mathematics/dp/1846283698/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256082496&sr=1-1

It's an exhaustive introduction analysis at the level of the metric space that's well worth reading.

Kim Greene
  • 3,583
  • 10
  • 42
  • 41
2

Introduction to Analysis by William R. Wade

https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Analysis-4th-William-Wade/dp/0132296381/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256082707&sr=1-1

This is a good transition from undergraduate calculus to analysis.

Kim Greene
  • 3,583
  • 10
  • 42
  • 41
2

Godement "Analysis" (I,II,III,IV) https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Convergence-Elementary-functions-Universitext/dp/3540059237

"... The content is quite classical ... [...] The treatment is less classical: precise although unpedantic (rather far from the definition-theorem-corollary-style), it contains many interesting commentaries of epistemological, pedagogical, historical and even political nature. [...] The author gives frequent interesting hints on recent developments of mathematics connected to the concepts which are introduced. The Introduction also contains comments that are very unusual in a book on mathematical analysis, going from pedagogy to critique of the French scientific-military-industrial complex, but the sequence of ideas is introduced in such a way that readers are less surprised than they might be.

samv
  • 19
  • 2
2

How about an anti-recommendation? Someone in another answer mentioned Steven Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right. My comment, not as someone who has used this book in a class, but as someone who has taught the students from this class during the following term: It doesn't prepare the students to use linear algebra in engineering, in physics, in chemistry, or even in branches of mathematics other than abstract algebra.

Gerald Edgar
  • 40,238
  • I suppose the correct thing to ask then is: what WOULD you use?

    Not to be confrontational, just that the standard around these parts is pretty poor, and Axler is considered much better.

    Also, could you explain what they're not teaching? I'd be interested to know!

    Thanks!

    – Michael Hoffman Oct 30 '09 at 13:27
  • What they're not teaching?

    Here is a true story: Students took an HONORS course in linear algebra. Next term, I was to teach these same students an honors course in differential equations. We started with linear ODEs. I work out the standard formulas. After class, a student comes to me and says: "I asked the others, and none of us has ever heard of Cramer's Rule." So, I added some exercises on Cramer's Rule for them. But I was so amazed by this that I found out what textbook had been used (it was "Linear Algebra Done Right") and verified that there is no mention of Cramer's Rule.

    – Gerald Edgar Oct 30 '09 at 22:51
  • 3
    Then how about "Linear Algebra Done Wrong", available for free at http://www.math.brown.edu/~treil/papers/LADW/LADW.html? – Henning Arnór Úlfarsson Nov 06 '09 at 21:47
  • 1
    @Gerald: I'm not sure omission of Cramer's Rule is such a big deal. Cramer's Rule is helpful for solving small linear systems (2 or 3 unknowns) since there are useful heuristics for calculating the determinants of 2x2 and 3x3 matrices, but Gaussian elimination is a more powerful and general algorithm for solving linear systems. – las3rjock Nov 07 '09 at 15:49
  • 1
  • Then how about "Linear Algebra Done Wrong", *
  • Looks good, actually. Suitable for students interested in other branches of mathematics!

    – Gerald Edgar Dec 30 '09 at 13:35
  • 2
    The book is for students already familiar with matrix algebra, so this is not a valid criticism of the book. – Michael Greinecker May 25 '10 at 20:51
  • The best LA book for students at the honors level I've seen is Friedberg,Insel and Spenser. Very comprehensive and rigorous with a lot of nice examples and exercises. Curtis' book is very nice too and has a better treatment of Jordan canonical form. – The Mathemagician May 25 '10 at 23:42