If I were the person creating category theory, I wouldn’t have been interested in left and right cancellation. I may or may not notice it, but it doesn’t feel fundamental enough for me to define it generally or give it a name. Question: if you tell me a morphism is epic or monic, what other insight do I gain about the morphism that is equivalent but conceptually what we actually use? (since just taking about cancellations seems unnatural and unworthy of a name to me right now).
As an example I’ve thought about stuff like “information is lost” but that doesn’t feel like it works somehow.
EDIT: ok I've heard they're supposed to be categorical generalisations of injections and bijections, but from the definition they don't always behave in ways you'd expect (just incase, I can find some places if you want). Is there a more general but relatable way to think about them that eliminates this occasional weirdness?
In the setting of relations, certain cancellable relations are called functions; others having more cancellation properties may be called surjective functions. Incidentally, relations give us inequational reasoning and functions shift that to equational.
All the best :-)
– Musa Al-hassy Jan 22 '19 at 12:43