29

According to this article, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 46.61.600 prohibits people from starting their cars in Washington State if they're unoccupied. However, it's a common practice for people to turn on their cars before entering, so the vehicle will be warmed up upon use. Here is some of the text of the statute:

No person driving or in charge of a motor vehicle shall permit it to stand unattended without first stopping the engine, locking the ignition, removing the key and effectively setting the brake thereon and, when standing upon any perceptible grade, turning the front wheels to the curb or side of the highway.

Is it actually illegal in Washington State to start your car before entering?

CGCampbell
  • 676
  • 5
  • 19
The Editor
  • 1,285
  • 8
  • 28
  • Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on [meta], or in [chat]. Comments continuing discussion may be removed. – Dale M Nov 03 '23 at 22:20

5 Answers5

47

Yes. This is illegal in Washington State (the link is from November 9, 2020).

The law means what it says, with one subtle caveat, which is that this law applies only on a public road, and not on your own private driveway. As explained at the link (emphasis added):

PASCO, WA - As colder temperatures move into the Pacific Northwest, if you decide to warm your car up, do not leave it unattended and running. Remember, that is against Washington law. Police officers want to remind drivers who leave their cars running and unattended could face fines or a bigger problem, car theft.

Sgt. Rigo Pruneda said Pasco Police said authorities have been very busy in the Tri-Cities responding to car break-ins. He said when the temperatures get below freezing overnight, people's wind-shields get icy and frosted over.

That's when drivers are tempted to start their car and let them warm up in the morning and go back inside to finish getting ready for work.

"What happens is people see it as an opportunity to take your vehicle, because it is insecure and it is running. So, we just want to remind everybody, if they are going to warm up the car. Please, do not leave it unattended. Stay with the vehicle," Sgt. Pruneda said.

In the state of Washington, it is against the law to leave your car running while it is unattended and you can receive a ticket.

While it is legal for drivers to warm their cars up on their own property, police recommend not doing that, because that provides thieves an opportunity to steal your car.

Also, for future reference, an unattended car that is running is colloquially called a "puffer".

ohwilleke
  • 211,353
  • 14
  • 403
  • 716
  • 9
    Is there some legal definition of 'unattended'? It seems like being outside the car is fine as long as you can see it or maybe even your kid (who is a minor and doesn't have a drivers licence) can see it. – quarague Nov 03 '23 at 01:33
  • 15
    @quarague> lawinsider defines it as “being at such a distance that the driver are unable to intervene to prevent interference with the vehicle or any goods in it”. And a quick search unveils many people getting citations for leaving an unattended vehicle running while they got at the ATM or picked up an order. – spectras Nov 03 '23 at 04:36
  • @spectras so in theory if you have remote start and a camera+way to view it, you could say you can intervene/prevent interference from anywhere?? – JeopardyTempest Nov 03 '23 at 07:07
  • 5
    @JeopardyTempest I am not so sure about intervening as unless you install some attachments you can control remotely (robot arms???), all you can do with a camera is helplessly watch... – htmlcoderexe Nov 03 '23 at 07:51
  • @htmlcoderexe wouldn't remote start allow you to turn the car off (and also to keep doors locked)? And if you do those things, the car is back to the initial state, so that seems to be proper intervention to me?? (I'm particularly thinking of modern cars that have apps or such... though an advanced keyfob [reliably] within range might also satisfy?) – JeopardyTempest Nov 03 '23 at 09:16
  • @JeopardyTempest I don't know which car you are talking about, but based on my personal experience, a car with an engine running cannot be turned off with the key fob remotely. – Andrew T. Nov 03 '23 at 09:25
  • 8
    My Ford Ranger has remote start. The doors remain locked, and in fact I can't drive it until and unless I put the key into the ignition and turn it to run (in effect "starting" the vehicle, although all it does is make the truck usable). Using remote start, for me, does not make my truck any less secure than it was before I remotely started it. – CGCampbell Nov 03 '23 at 10:04
  • 1
    @CGCampbell The law doesn't care about stuff like that. – ohwilleke Nov 03 '23 at 16:07
  • 6
    Some states have laws that take remote start into account in those laws and exclude them because of the safety's built in. In this case it seems that Washington State doesn't have that exclusion. On the flip side there are some states that have anti idling laws that prohibit the act of remote starting to warm up vehicles. – Joe W Nov 03 '23 at 16:40
  • 1
    @quarague I think it's also illegal in WA to leave a kid in a running car (I don't know of a law specifically against leaving a kid in a non-running car, though obviously it's a bad idea in most cases). – stannius Nov 03 '23 at 18:41
  • Adding to CGCampbell's question, what about vehicles that don't have an engine, don't have an ignition, and/or don't have a key (that can be removed)? – usul Nov 04 '23 at 04:44
  • 2
  • "Ma'am! You get a ticket, sorry.", - "Wha! Why?!", - "You dear make it easier or basically provoke this person to steal your car, Ma'am. This is illegal."
  • – Artfaith Nov 04 '23 at 20:54
  • @ohwilleke: The right judge might, if and when you contest your ticket, but you're correct that it's not a guarantee to work and you might just get someone who reads the letter of the law and not its spirit. – Flater Nov 06 '23 at 00:32
  • I have a followup question: How do we determine that there's an exception when on your own property? I don't think the statute makes that an exception. Is it just that private property falls outside the jurisdiction/scope of traffic statutes? – The Editor Nov 06 '23 at 17:01
  • 1
    @TheEditor, yes to your last question. – Michael Hall Dec 03 '23 at 15:12