1

Do organizations have to use domains according to their financial status and would they be liable for civil or criminal liability if they didn't use domains appropriate to their status (non profit/.org or for profit/.com). Also would using a website that has ad revenue or cookies on it automatically make one a customer or trader legally (the item traded being personal data)?

  • 1
    There was a time when .org did not exist... – Jon Custer Apr 18 '23 at 13:42
  • @JonCuster that time was also the time when .com did not exist. Both were created on January 1, 1985. – phoog Apr 18 '23 at 13:43
  • This blog claims: While [.com] was originally conceived to host commercial websites, nowadays its use has extended to any type of site, despite the long list of alternatives devised for other purposes.. – Weather Vane Apr 18 '23 at 13:44
  • @phoog - sigh, old brain. Org was not taken up nearly as fast as Com as I recall at the time. But I was mostly on Edu. All of it was better than Bitnet addresses... – Jon Custer Apr 18 '23 at 13:50
  • The use of cookies does not mean you are trading personal data. – Weather Vane Apr 18 '23 at 13:54
  • 1
    but can visiting a website which earns profits through ads that you view a commercial transaction ? –  Apr 18 '23 at 14:30
  • "can visiting a website which earns profits through ads that you view [be] a commercial transaction?" Indeed, and another commercial transaction is the use of visitors' data for commercial purposes. – phoog Apr 18 '23 at 16:30
  • @JonCuster But I still miss .uucp on occasion. :) – doneal24 Apr 18 '23 at 20:50
  • Earning money through ads or using your personal data from cookies does not imply that the website owner is commercial. Non-profits are allowed to have revenues like that as well. Non-profit just restricts what they do with the money afterwards. – quarague Apr 19 '23 at 09:52
  • @quarague why does Wikipedia ask for emergency donations if this is true ? –  Apr 26 '23 at 11:15

2 Answers2

6

There is no law pertaining to top level domains, defining "appropriateness". Instead, some organization is an administrator, and there is an understanding as to what the purpose of the domain is, but this is not legally enforceable. The TLDs com, org, net are open to anyone, whereas edu is limited in the US to accredited post-secondary institutions, however some non-educational commercial enterprises were grandfathered in. Insofar as registering a com-domain website does not entail "an intent to make profit" and registering an org-domain website does not entail "an intent to not make a profit", there is no deception w.r.t. internet users. One would of course have to be truthful in registering the domain.

Public Interest Registry, the administrator for org, does not even purport that businesses registered under org should be "nonprofit".

user6726
  • 214,947
  • 11
  • 343
  • 576
-2

Your (and many other people's) understanding of "non-profit" is incorrect. How do you think small organizations grow into multinational and worldwide organizations that dwarf for-profit businesses? By making a profit. Non-profits should be making a profit for financial stability and growth. However, there are limits. Laws and regulations will vary by locality and country.

Do some research, but this is a good place to learn a little about it: Myths About Nonprofits

As for the tech side, .org was initially thought of being used for non-profits. However, there is no law or rule in a Terms of Service stating this. Certainly no one was checking whether or not an organization was or was not for-profit. Just like there is no rule requiring a .com address be used for commercial purposes. As the internet took off, the demand for domain names skyrocketed and the initial plan for Top Level Domains was quickly abandoned and even more were added. Why? For profit!

Keltari
  • 1,178
  • 9
  • 20
  • 1
    Non-profit doesn’t actually mean not profit-making. It means not paying dividends or being sold for capital gain. But that’s too verbose, and so the shorter but technically inaccurate term is used instead. – Mike Scott Apr 19 '23 at 06:23