5

I've heard mentions of people using tertiary, quaternary, quinary, etc fermentations. Does this really provide any significant benefit beyond secondary?

drj
  • 2,137
  • 3
  • 15
  • 29
Fishtoaster
  • 2,882
  • 6
  • 25
  • 36

3 Answers3

4

I think this same answer applies here:

What's the point of secondary fermentation

The purpose of n-ary isn't more fermentation, but aging, clarifying, etc.

So for me, no it doesn't provide any additional benefit. The only time I use a secondary vessel is for fruit additions or extended aging. I've never found a need for a third vessel.

Community
  • 1
sgwill
  • 4,160
  • 28
  • 42
  • This. I've heard of some people who are overly anal about clarity racking three or four times, but it's honestly not necessary and just increases the risk of oxidation or, to a lesser extent, infection. – Jeff L Nov 15 '10 at 22:22
  • 1
    Sometimes the purpose of n-ary fermentation is more fermentation. You can work with higher "effective" O.G. by adding additional sugars ( and possibly more yeast ). I make a quad that I add boiled molasses to after primary fermentation; and I add a type of indian date sugar boiled in water and additional yeast before tertiary fermentation. For extremely high gravity beers I don't think this is unreasonable. –  Nov 16 '10 at 17:58
3

I've heard of having a tertiary phase if you add fruit (etc.) to the beer during the secondary, to help precipitate out the fruit particles before bottling.

Nick
  • 1,312
  • 2
  • 11
  • 15
2

I can't get a pumpkin ale clean with only a secondary for the life of me. Next batch I plan on using a tertiary. Just be careful with splashing, I've been careless and oxidized the hell out of an otherwise good beer before.

PMV
  • 3,799
  • 4
  • 28
  • 32