85

Re-posting this question of mine from the Worldbuilding Stack Exchange:

I know it's common for shops and stores to be named in D&D and other fantasy settings, but how common was that practice in the medieval era (say, from 1000 AD onward)? It seems to me that inns and the like were named more often than, say, the workshops of smiths, traders, or other craftsmen and merchants.

I'm trying to be as "realistic" as possible with the campaign world I'm establishing, so if there's historical precedent, I'll feel better about it.

Edit: It's also been brought to my attention to clarify whether or not I mean this in a general or specific sense. The answer is the former. If the convention wasn't really present in Asian or Middle Easter countries, for example, but was in European ones, that information still helps immensely. I'm just hoping to find out how popular the practice was in the medieval era.

MCW
  • 33,640
  • 12
  • 105
  • 158
Adamant8765
  • 759
  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 19
    If I'm not mistaking, the practice of naming shops goes all the way back to classical antiquity. See for instance "Thermopolium of Asellina" or "Caseggiato del Termopolio". – Denis de Bernardy Nov 03 '19 at 08:01
  • Welcome to History:SE. Could you edit your question to clarify what you've looked into already, complete with links and references, and context if applicable? In particular, please let us know what you find missing or unclear about the Wikipedia entry on the topic, if one exists. This allows those who might want to answer to do so without needing to redo the work you've already done. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and Help Centre and, in particular, How to Ask. – MCW Nov 03 '19 at 11:14
  • 9
    How useful would be written name of your store if most of your customers (and store owner himself) was illiterate? – Peter M. - stands for Monica Nov 03 '19 at 17:27
  • 4
    Pretty useful if you're trying to tell a random passer-by what you're looking for. – Gort the Robot Nov 03 '19 at 17:59
  • It should be reasonable to assume that, at least for high value items that even used trade names, for example Ulfberht swords, the smithy or workshop would be clearly marked. – Guntram Blohm Nov 04 '19 at 11:49
  • 1
    I don't know enough to post this as a proper answer, but I believe I read that images were used - 3-balls = pawnshop, red & white pole = barber/surgeon, and all the tavern names like the "hare & hog" would have images of the creatures named. So I'm guessing if there are 3 smithy shops, and they're trying to differentiate to strangers (a local would know that this is X's kid's shop), they could do the same thing: a horseshoe (for smithy) + an image of a tree or animal or whatever?) Maybe also stamped on the items made? Just thoughts. – April Salutes Monica C. Nov 04 '19 at 13:44
  • 2
    Were names necessary? In how many cities were there more than one shop of a given kind? I suspect that the common name of a shop is "the blacksmith", or very rarely, "the blacksmith in ladyfriars" - for the rare instance of a city large enough to have neighborhoods. My oversimplified understanding is that prior to Quaker Oats and brand names, consumers didn't really have a choice about which shop they patronized. – MCW Nov 04 '19 at 15:04
  • 3
    IIRC, 85% of the population were serfs who could not engage in commerce. Another 3-5 % were nobles and could not engage in commercial enterprise. Let's assume that the clergy are included in the nobility and the destitute in the peasants. That means that there are only 5/hundred who can occupy all commercial niches. There are only 210 cities in Europe with a population > 10K. that 5% potential commercial is shared among those cities and every village with a cobbler or skilled tradesman. – MCW Nov 04 '19 at 15:25
  • 2
    Permanent shops were less common in the middle ages, town markets were the main area of trade. The industrial production in towns was generally under the control of guilds, and the shops were marked with marks/heralds of these guilds (as it was mentioned, most costumers were illiterate, so to guide them). – Greg Nov 04 '19 at 22:42
  • @MarkC.Wallace Could you refine a little what period / are you talking about? In most Europe town markets were common. Also, in medieval Europe very few cobblers lived, I highly double any lived in villages, as peasants didn't wear leather shoes or boots. – Greg Nov 04 '19 at 22:46
  • 7
    @MarkC.Wallace Your estimation of 3-5% nobility is very off in Europe, as far as I know only Poland and Hungary had anything close to this number. Also, nobility did engage in commercial activity, both as selling produces and buying e.g import products. See eg. " The consumer and the market in the later middle ages" Economic History Review, 2nd ser., XLII, 3(I989), pp. 305-327 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2596436.pdf) – Greg Nov 04 '19 at 22:56
  • 1
    In view of MartinBonnersupportsMonica's comment below, can you clarify whether or not you are interested only in shops which displayed their name? – Lars Bosteen Nov 05 '19 at 00:59
  • 1
    Ye Olde Shoppe seemed pretty popular. – M.Mat Nov 05 '19 at 23:18
  • This isn't an answer, just a logical sidenote. A name is not necessary if there's only one. This is why we still talk about "the moon" and "the sun", because the Earth only has one of each. Similarly, a town with one shop can just refer to it as "the shop", at least for conversations in this town. Multiple shops may exist in different towns (just as more than one moon exists in the solar system), but if the scope of the current discussion only has one (this town, or the Earth for the moon example), then no specific name is needed. – Flater Nov 06 '19 at 10:23
  • Even up to the mid-20th century, having a shop named other than for its owner is a rarity. – OrangeDog Nov 06 '19 at 12:16

5 Answers5

79

Short Answer

For the most part, we have little evidence for the naming of shops, especially before the Late Middle Ages in Europe. Visual evidence suggests that almost all shops did not publicly display a name but some did display an object representing their trade. A surviving example of a shop name from England is La Corner Schoppe, while in Italy at least a merchant might use his family name. In China, medicine shop names were common in the 10th and 11th centuries at least, examples including Infant Malnutrition Medicine Shop and Ugly Granny Medicine Shop.


Details

Our evidence for medieval Europe is patchy. David Garrioch, in the article House names, shop signs and social organization in Western European cities, 1500-1900 (Urban History Vol. 21, No. 1 (April 1994), writes:

The history of shop signs reaches back at least to Roman times. In northern Europe, however, the earliest traces seem to date from the thirteenth century, although it is possible that they were in use before then. By the sixteenth century both signs and names seem to have been numerous all over Europe, and the evidence suggests that their numbers continued to increase in most cities until the eighteenth century.

In a footnote, Garrioch cites evidence from Adolphe Berty (1855). He

found two in Paris from 1206 and 1212. He argued that they were probably more numerous than the records suggest, but he adds that there was no doubt less need for them in the less crowded outer areas than in the city centre

In a study of one part of Paris by Berty published 5 years later

the earliest sign found...dates from the 1340s and the house-lists for this part of Paris in 1280 do not contain any.

For London, the oldest shop sign with a name found is from 1278, according to the BBC article La Corner Schoppe: the funny origins of shop names:

The earliest recorded shop name is La Corner Schoppe [sic]. The name was found in a document written in 1278 in Westminster, London. However there were numerous Corner Shops throughout the 1200s onwards, but most would have taken the name of the building.

The orginal source for 'La Corner Schoppe' (actually 'la Cornereschoppe') is the Calendar of Wills Proved and Enrolled in the Court of Husting, London: Part 1, 1258-1358 (ANNO 7 EDWARD I)

Readings in Medieval History, Volume II has primary source material on a Florentine merchant, Stagio, who used his own name for his shop, but it's not clear if this was displayed or not.

The history of signboards: from the earliest times to the present day is a dated source (1867) quite detailed:

...signs were of but little use. A few objects, typical of the trade carried on, would suffice; a knife for the cutler, a stocking for the hosier, a hand for the glover, a pair of scissors for the tailor, a bunch of grapes for the vintner, fully answered public requirements. But as luxury increased, and the number of houses or shops dealing in the same article multiplied, something more was wanted. Particular trades continued to be confined to particular streets ; the desideratum then was, to give to each shop a name or token by which it might be mentioned in conversation, so that it could be recommended, and customers sent to it. Reading was still a scarce acquirement; consequently, to write up the owner's name would have been of little use.


Looking at images of medieval art seems to confirm the above. Most shops have no sign of any kind, but a few have objects - see, for example, and the images below.

enter image description here

Siena, 1300s.

enter image description here

"Pontifical de Sens, France, XIVe siècle". Source: BnF, previously posted by LangLangC in his answer to another question.

The webpage Merchants’ Stalls & Shops has links to more images from various European cities. The only sign with writing is this "Hand-colored 19th-century woodcut reproduction of a medieval illustration", but even here none of the other establishments visible seem to have any signage (there's a better image here). There are also a number of illustrations of shops (salt, cheese, butcher's shops) in the Tacuinum Sanitatis but none appear to have names displayed.

enter image description here

Selling salt in a shop, miniature from Tacuinum sanitatis, end of 14th century. Source: habsburger.net


Without saying so explicitly, it seems that medicine shops in 10th & 11th century China had shop signs. A Social History of Medieval China gives numerous examples of shops with names (including the imaginatively named Ugly Granny Medicine Shop), but doesn't actually directly say they had names on signs.

Lars Bosteen
  • 107,936
  • 20
  • 483
  • 554
  • 5
    That matches my own experience and impression (completely non-structured and without references, thus not writing up an answer) - especially the part about shops having symbols indicating what kind of shop it is, but not a name.

    Also keep in mind that at least written signs would have been a waste for most of the middle ages, as literacy rates were low.

    – Tom Nov 04 '19 at 11:38
  • 21
    Just because the shop didn't have a sign, doesn't mean it didn't have a name (which is what the OP asked about). – Martin Bonner supports Monica Nov 04 '19 at 14:30
  • 3
    @MartinBonnersupportsMonica Valid point, the OP doesn't explictely state that but then the name serves a limited purpose for the public if it isn't displayed (though it may have been needed legally in some places). – Lars Bosteen Nov 04 '19 at 14:43
  • 4
    Does it really serve a limited purpose? If you want to meet someone at the pub, and there are two pubs in town, you need a simple way to tell them which pub. It's not like villages didn't get names until villagers got literate. – Gort the Robot Nov 04 '19 at 15:00
  • 6
    @GorttheRobot "hey i'll meet you at the pub by johns farm" – DatsunZ1 Nov 04 '19 at 15:58
  • 2
    Another point to keep in mind is the literacy rate at the time, which was poor, but increasing progressively through the middle ages. In the UK in the 1200s few people outside the nobility and upper classes could likely read a sign - imagery would probably have been more relevant than text. In the 1500s Thomas More estimated the literacy rate at around 40%, and in the 1000s it would have been much lower than that. – J... Nov 04 '19 at 20:27
  • 1
    @GorttheRobot True, except MartinBonnersupportsMonica's comment referred to shops, not pubs. – Lars Bosteen Nov 04 '19 at 22:56
  • 2
    The point applies to shops as well. I see no reason why having a sign with a name on it is a requirement for something to have a name. It's like saying people didn't have names because people couldn't read nametags. – Gort the Robot Nov 04 '19 at 23:51
  • 2
    You could have a shop called 'the cobbler with the sign of a red pointy shoe" in conversation but no official name beyond "mr Cobbler's shop on main street" – Borgh Nov 05 '19 at 11:00
  • 1
    "However there were numerous Corner Shops throughout the 1200s onwards . . ." likely named "Ye Olde Corner Shoppe". :-) – RobertF Nov 05 '19 at 20:41
  • @GorttheRobot John's pub or Harold's pub? – OrangeDog Nov 06 '19 at 12:19
  • @GorttheRobot or indeed, at the sign of the prancing pony? – OrangeDog Nov 06 '19 at 12:20
  • Has anyone seen a primary reference for the "La Corner Schoppe" claim? The BBC Radio 4 article sounds like they just made it up. In other words, I'd like to know which "document written in 1278 in Westminster, London" supposedly has this name in it. A quick google search didn't find anything. Color me skeptical... – user2705196 Nov 06 '19 at 14:08
  • 1
    @user2705196 Hard to find as the BBC article spelt it wrong. I've edited and added the primary source. – Lars Bosteen Nov 06 '19 at 14:27
  • 1
    @LarsBosteen Wow. That's amazing. Thanks for digging that up and finding the correct spelling. I shouldn't have doubted the trustworthiness of the BBC...! – user2705196 Nov 06 '19 at 14:34
21

The Academy of Saint Gabriel is a group of volunteers who have compiled lists of historical names from the Medieval and Renaissance periods. Their compilations of Sign Names for Places include:

  • Dated references to inn and tavern names by Mari ingen Briain meic Donnchada (Kathleen M. O'Brien)

    Early name references for inns and taverns here include:

    • Lamme (attested 1320)
    • Ramme (attested 1707 and 1339)
    • Cok (attested 1327)
    • Hegle (contemporary for eagle, attested 1273)
    • Raven (attested 1344)
    • Swan (attested 1337)
    • Harp and Harpe (attested late 14th century)
    • Hat (attested 1273)
    • Ros and Rose (attested 1273)
    • Whytehors, Whytehorse and Whithors (attested respectively 1285, 1312, 1358)
    • Sevensterre, Seusterrys and Sevesterre (attested respectively 1355, 1379, 1384)
    • George and Jorge (attested respectivley 1472 and 1479)
    • Bosoms yn (attested 1522)
    • Mitford taverne (attested 1489)
  • Comparison of Inn/Shop/House names found London 1473-1600 with those found in the ten shires surrounding London in 1636

Pieter Geerkens
  • 72,560
  • 9
  • 210
  • 330
  • 7
    I'm surprised it doesn't contain a great reference: The Tabard Inn is referenced by name in the Canterbury tales. – Gort the Robot Nov 03 '19 at 18:06
  • @GorttheRobot: The goal of the group is to dig up poorly known references - as the well known ones are ... well known. – Pieter Geerkens Nov 04 '19 at 14:56
  • 5
    I know the UK has a long history with Public Houses' signage, quite often going back to Medieval times. (The tradition being iconography that is invariably interpreted slightly differently among locals than is done with the official written name). According to the WP page, they were required by the king to have identifying signage starting in 1393. Technically that's still Middle Ages (but barely). – T.E.D. Nov 04 '19 at 19:58
  • 4
    @T.E.D. In my research, I also came across a local law passed in Cambridge in 1420 that pubs had to have signs, but there was no such law for shops. These laws would at least partly account for Pieter's lists being so heavy on pub names compared to shops. – Lars Bosteen Nov 04 '19 at 23:02
  • 3
    @LarsBosteen: I suspect you mean "inns" rather than "pubs" - establishments providing accommodation and stabling as well as refreshment. Yes - in a world with few or no maps or village/town signs but inns at many major intersections, directions would likely be in reference to those landmark establishments loated near those intersections. – Pieter Geerkens Nov 04 '19 at 23:24
  • 1
    @PieterGeerkens Yes, you're right, inns not pubs :), and good point on inns at intersections. – Lars Bosteen Nov 05 '19 at 00:13
  • 2
    "Bosoms yn" a popular inn for male travellers? – RobertF Nov 05 '19 at 20:43
2

Most villages didn't have shops.

Think of the population size. You grew up with these same people all your life. No one went anywhere. Peddlars traveled. Tinkers repaired pots. Gypsys had skills needed too. You either made it yourself or traded for it.

I live in extreme southwest Kansas. Raised on my grandmothers homestead. 11 children in my class until high school. The citizens here do their own work: welding, tree felling, horse breaking, milking, and no we're not Amish or something other. We didn't have street signs until UPS required them. Then we did the county. When we need someone with special skill or equipment, we ask around.

My address is driving instructions. 9 miles south, 15 miles west of the NW corner of a town because I live on a dirt track. The whole county except state highways are dirt roads- county seat excepting. Lots of rural anywhere in the world is the same now.

Imagine a thousand years ago, check the population of the region you are interested in, and extrapolate up as the population rises. By the way, even in metro USA, people tend to stay within their small corners of it. I have no idea why. I lived in Denver for a while and was all over the place.

T.E.D.
  • 118,977
  • 15
  • 300
  • 471
Nina
  • 37
  • 1
  • 5
    "Most villages didn't have shops." -- That wasn't really true until the fall of the Roman Empire though. Until then you actually had merchants (not all with shops) who shipped goods right left and center, as evidenced for instance by the quantity of (North African) red pottery in most archeological sites across the Western Empire. The economy collapsed in the UK after the fall of Rome, but the same didn't happen everywhere else. In Northern France and Western Spain, the economy took a hit. In the Mediterranean basin, trade basically continued uninterrupted, albeit with different patterns. – Denis de Bernardy Nov 04 '19 at 17:24
  • @DenisdeBernardy Villages, town, market towns are all different things. Also, since Spain was mostly conquered during the medieval period, I really wouldn't call it typical to Europe. – Greg Nov 04 '19 at 23:03
  • They had fairs too, one-two times a year, during great holidays, one fair for whole region with a dozen (or more) of villages. – user28434 Nov 05 '19 at 09:18
  • 2
    You live in a homestead, not a village. These days, you may be relying on deliveries from the Internet or large companies or on traveling to shop in large towns and cities, but in the middle ages those were not really options (I mean, you could travel to someplace large but if it takes a week then you would very rarely do it). – einpoklum Nov 05 '19 at 21:40
1

One point is that trade went through a massive expansion in the 12th/13th centuries. Here is a review of a beautiful and fascinating book on the subject: Spufford: Power and Profit. Other books also by Peter Spufford cover similar territory and are similarly worthwhile. So in major cities, at least, you might need to be more specific about which period you are interested in.

Stretching the question, it might help to look at English cities in the early-modern period, just because then we have some humble, everyday publications that advertise their printing shop:

Those are two early examples out of many in the Bodleian library's collection of broadside publications. You can find more, though later, examples (search for "sign" in the "Imprint" section of Advanced Search). The printers' shops are referenced by address and a nearby sign, presumably of a pub in most cases. We can stop searching for "sign", but stay in the 16th century, to find some addresses without signs (all from the Bodleian broadside website mentioned):

  • "Imprinted at London by Abel Ieffs, and are to be soulde by William Barley dwelling in gracious strete neare leaden haule";
  • "Imprinted at London, by Richard Iones, dwelling neere Holburne Bridge";
  • "Imprinted at London in Fletestrete nere to S. Dunstons church by Thomas Marshe";
  • "Imprynted at Norwich in the paryshe of Saynct Andrews by Anthony de Solempne. 1570".

If we accept that these are (partially) relevant to your question, it seems that the name of the printer is how the shop was identified. (At times, there would have been a legal requirement to name the printer, as each publication required a licence, but the first example makes it clear that this is also an advert for trade.)

Ed Wynn
  • 201
  • 1
  • 2
-2

Short and very general answer -- if the town was big enough to have shops, a common practice was to have pictorial signs. These might be standardized tools of the trade as another poster mentioned, or might just be a memorable and easy to describe image. The location of an inn might then be given as "under the sign of the dancing pig." These references still persist in traditional music and stories, for example "I live at the sign of the ups and downs" in the song by the same name.

Leith
  • 9
  • 7
    Sources to support your assertions would greatly improve your answer. – sempaiscuba Nov 04 '19 at 23:20
  • According to Wikipedia house numbering, as opposed to naming began to come in in Britain in the Eighteenth century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_numbering#United_Kingdom. Before that it was customary for houses and commercial buildings alike to have pictorial signs by which they were known, a custom continued by pubs today. In Charles Dickens' early novel 'Barnaby Rudge' the locksmith Mr Varden and his family live at and trade from 'the House of the Golden Key' distinguished by a Golden Key sign hanging outside, which gives the house its name and advertises its occupants' business. – Timothy Nov 06 '19 at 19:39