0

Uncertainty is inherent in geospatial data... Maybe it's supposed to be obvious, and, some standards forget to define it.

The RFC 5870A Uniform Resource Identifier for Geographic Locations ('geo' URI) — has no clue about the uncertainty measurement definition:

The u ("uncertainty") parameter indicates the amount of uncertainty in the location as a value in meters.

The statistical/metrological uncertainty is a well-known measurement, and usually associated with a disk around the point, but the measurement could be defined as the radius or the diameter of the disk.


Note. If the RFC is really informal, perhaps any set of GIS "trusted books" (or scientific papers) could be used as evidence... It seems that radius is the most widely adopted.

Peter Krauss
  • 2,292
  • 23
  • 43

1 Answers1

2

That RFC refers to uncertainty in RFC5491, and a Wikipedia section on Uncertainty in Geo URIs assesses it to mean the radius of a Gaussian error model containing 95% of the total unit probability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo_URI_scheme#Uncertainty

I've not seen much adoption of the geo: URI so I am not surprised this hasn't really cropped up much.

Spacedman
  • 63,755
  • 5
  • 81
  • 115