Yes, given your weight and pace I'd expect a value below 150 Kcal. A way to confirm this would be to plug your details into a couple of the common Kcal estimation equations and take an average eg.
The ACSM and MET formula:
ACSM Kcal/Min ~= 0.0005 * bodyMassKg * metersWalkedInAMin + 0.0035
~= 0.0005 * 70 * 96 + 0.0035
~= 3.3635 Kcal/Min
~= 115 Kcal in 34.25 min / 3.3Km
MET Kcal ~= METS * bodyMassKg * timePerformingHours
~= 5.0 * 70 * 0.25
~= 87.5 Kcal/Mile
~= 180 in 3.3Km
where METS = 5.0 (walking, 4.0 mph, level, firm surface, very brisk pace)
Average: (180 + 115) / 2 = 147.5 Kcal in 3.3Km
As your fitness level is a significant factor in how much energy your body needs to perform a task, an even better way to confirm the accuracy of the Strava calculation would be to capture your heart rate after a mile, one of the free apps that uses your phone's camera, to measure the pulse in a finger should suffice, or just fall back on simply taking your pulse. Then at your leisure plug your heart rate, the split time to walk the mile, and a few vitals into the Rockport Walking test formula, to obtain an estimated VO2max score (fitness assessment score):
Estimated VO2Max = 132.853 - (0.0769 * WeightLbs) - (0.3877 * AgeYears) + (6.315 * isMale) - (3.2649 * TimeMinDecimal) - (0.1565 × HeartRateBPM)
Where:
- isMale: Male = 1, Female = 0
- Time to walk mile is expressed in minutes and 100ths of minutes
There are sites / apps that will do this for you eg. Heart Rate Based Calorie Burn Calculator, BioMetrIcs. As well as providing the summary Kcal for your activity.
Kcal/Min ~= 5 * massKg * VO2 / 1000
where:
VO2 = (currentHeartRate / MaxHeartRate) * VO2Max
MaxHeartRate ~= 210 - (0.8 * ageYears)
Note: There have been a few studies around that assessed the accuracy of the tracker apps eg. Why your fitness tracker could be a waste of money: New research shows the must-have gadgets are often wildly inaccurate by as much as 40 PER CENT