7

I have these rods with rounded ends, originally from a light fixture, with a full golden color of medium brightness and shine. I'd like to use those ends, and perhaps file more semispheres from the material. However, sanding one (to remove circular manufacturing traces), the cleaned material is not only quite light but hardly yellow, almost silvery with just a tinge of color.

What I want is to make it golden again, but not too dark nor dull, though high shine isn't necessary, nor matching the original finish. And while there's the option of finding another alloy, I want to learn about this case.

First I simply let the piece lie around, but this particular stuff hadn't darkened after a few days. (That was in cold, dry weather; current mild conditions actually do the trick. So I'm satisfied, but I let the question stand.) So I put it in water (really the last puddle from a bottle of ozone/oxygen disinfectant which had been standing around for months and smelled no more), thinking that would speed oxidation; yet the result of watering was still light and also actually coppery, shown in the picture.

A metal rod with original golden body and a tip turned coppery

(This photo doesn't bring out the lightness difference that well. Think of the tip as two notches lighter rather than one; and that was also so before the reddening.)

Then I went to read up on aging brass, thinking that was the material. I don't want to use strong chemicals or buy anything, so the options seemed to be salt sludge, vinegar solution (possibly salted), and coffee or coffee grounds. Yet all those articles aim at a pronounced patina, whereas I just want back a saturated golden hue like the original finish has, though the precise color doen't matter. Hence I'm wondering what to use and how to control the effect, also in relation to the times I'm at the workshop.

  • How do I get my gold back? That is, which agent do you recommend,
  • and how far to dilute it so that appreciable action will take either up to 3 or 4 hours, or at least 21 hours?

People indicated in comments that the metal might be pot metal or else low-copper brass because it's so bright and doesn't catch fingerprints, neither on the show surface nor nakedly. Density is around 8.6 g/cm3. It feels slippery under saw and file but is tougher than typical brass.

Below's a bulk color comparison after two or three weeks of cold, dry air exposure vs. newly sanded. It had darkened pretty nicely. Note that the bright one isn't quite silver and the copper red shown above is unmistakable I guess.

sanded
Sanded

air exposed
Air exposed


FYI, the application is giving this friendly fellow eyes, golden orbs (with slit pupils of course) on painted wood. Chinese dragon head sketch

Update My most elaborate, and prettiest, piece is finally done, after letting it lie a few times out of fear of botching what I had ;)

finished dragon before a sky, jewel heaps on clouds

ariola
  • 173
  • 5
  • 3
    Welcome to Arts & Crafts. Are you sure the rods are solid brass and not brass-plated cheaper metal? – fixer1234 Mar 14 '23 at 21:19
  • 2
    This is my thought as well; solid brass should be brass-toned the whole way through, so this is more likely brass-plated nickel or pot metal as opposed to solid brass. – Allison C Mar 14 '23 at 21:22
  • 1
    A magnet will tell you if the underlying metal is steel (which might be plated with some other metal before brass if the brass is plating). – fixer1234 Mar 14 '23 at 21:47
  • 4
    Well written post, including options and reasons for rejection, as well as a clear statement of objective. – fred_dot_u Mar 14 '23 at 21:49
  • So it would have to be something silvery with some copper in it, and reasonably durable in the house. I once worked what the colleage bringing it in described as hardened brass, which was similary bright but much tougher. And now I'm concerned about possible heavy metal content. How might I find out what goes into such items? Is there a stack for that? – ariola Mar 14 '23 at 21:59
  • 1
    @fred_dot_u, thanks! – ariola Mar 14 '23 at 22:00
  • Although this wasn't that buttery to saw, perhaps comparable to the stuff back then. – ariola Mar 14 '23 at 22:08
  • 1
    The first step would be to test it with a magnet. If this came from a light fixture, the metal probably isn't anything exotic. If it's not magnetic and it feels like a solid piece of metal, measure it and calculate its volume, and weigh it on a gram scale for resolution if you have one. Calculate its density from the weight and volume. A table of common metals will identify what it is. – fixer1234 Mar 14 '23 at 22:39
  • 1
    It doesn't respond to even a stack of magnets. How would density correspond to alloys? – ariola Mar 15 '23 at 08:00
  • 1
    Thanks for doing my work @Joachim! – ariola Mar 15 '23 at 11:50
  • 1
    I've just replaced my kitchen scales with some that have 0.1g precision, and a maximum of 3kg. They were about £10 on eBay ($/€12, described as coffee scales). It's well worth having decent scales in the home. For the volume: as you've got a hole, you should either calculate the dimensions of the hole and subtract from a calculation of the overall volume as primitive solids, or use a water-displacement method to measure the volume (using scales again). – Chris H Mar 16 '23 at 09:14
  • 1
    As this isn't really structural or exposed to a harsh environment, the metallurgy isn't really important, but cost is. Copper (and tin) are expensive compared to other non-ferrous metals, and it's apparently non-ferrous. So I wonder if it's a brass with a low copper content (the remainder being zinc, which is cheap), but plated with a higher copper-content brass. White brass is easily cast, and casting can be very cheap in mass manufacturing, if . So if you do try to identify it by density, don't forget that there's a range for brasses – Chris H Mar 16 '23 at 09:27
  • BTW fiddling with the white balance of the photos can produce a range of results, with the paper background always looking white; these results will also depend on the reader's monitor – Chris H Mar 16 '23 at 09:33
  • Updated the density number. The volume is calculated from dimensions, respecting the hole. – ariola Mar 16 '23 at 10:12
  • 1
    That new density is pretty good for brass, and not a terribly low Cu content. Aluminium, and zinc and its alloys (pot metal, pewter) are considerably less dense. As for tarnish on brass from handling, it's very variable depending on composition and who's doing the handling. The addition of a little tin or aluminium to the alloy makes it more corrosion-resistant. I wonder if the exposed core and the original surface behave the same in that regard. Tarnishing can be sped up (for testing) by applying a mix of salt and viengar – Chris H Mar 16 '23 at 14:44
  • Yes, the exposed material is also resistant, up to now. – ariola Mar 16 '23 at 18:20

1 Answers1

3

I'll get some ideas started. Some thoughts (updated):

  • It isn't really clear what the rod composition is. The gold color on the surface appears to be different from the metal comprising the rod (not just oxidation of the rod material). It looks and behaves like brass or bronze plating, rather than something like a lacquer coating. The implication is that you couldn't restore the same gold color on the dome by letting the metal oxidize.

    If it was brass plating, I'd expect it to be covered with dark, oxidized fingerprints from handling. It could also be something like titanium nitride, which has a gold color and is often used to coat things like drill bits.

    The rod is a silvery metal that isn't soft, darkens a little with oxidation, and it looks like the oxidation takes on a bit of a coppery tint. It isn't steel (non-magnetic). It probably isn't aluminum (which can be anodized with a lot of colors, but it's soft, oxidizes quickly to a grey color, and you would have noticed the light weight). The density estimate also pretty well rules it out.

    It's even possible that the dome and the rod are different metals. The rod could be made as tubing and the dome attached to the end.

    The question has been updated and talks about the exposed metal darkening and taking on a gold color. I'm not aware of anything that tarnishes as a gold color. So that's great if it will restore itself, but hold off on the champagne until the color matches the rod surface. If it doesn't get there, I'll leave the information in this answer to provide some options.

  • Estimating the density looks like the effort was too crude for that to be helpful. An estimated density of 8.6 g/cc is in the ballpark of what some of the likely metals would be. If you think it's actually very close to that number, it would rule out something mostly tin. Mostly zinc might still be within the margin or error. But it sounds like the weight estimate is not reliable, or precise enough to differentiate the composition in a way that would be useful. In case you're able to refine the estimate, here's a table of metal densities for comparison: Density of Metals.

    It could be an alloy, but for this application, it would probably be something variable and nondescript (pot metal), rather than a specific alloy with targeted properties. It might be mostly zinc or tin, although those are soft metals. As Chris H suggested in a comment, it could be low-copper brass. The presence of a little copper might explain the coppery colored oxidation.

  • The type of metal makes a difference in several ways. Plating will stick to some metals better than others. You often need to plate a piece with a layer of one metal and then plate that with the finish metal. You could always just try to plate it directly with brass and see what happens. If Chris H is right about it potentially being low-copper brass, brass plating ought to stick.

  • There is at least one method that involves heat, and the melting temperature comes into play. For example, tin melts at 232°C (you could melt it in a toaster oven), zinc at 420°C, and most of the other metals it could be (or that are likely to be alloyed in), melt at much higher temperatures. If you have a small butane or propane torch, you could heat one of the cut ends, or shave off some small pieces and heat them, to see if melting starts at a relatively low temperature. If you happen to have an infrared thermometer, you could measure it and get an idea of the likely predominant metal. Here's a table of melting points: Melting Point of Metals & Alloys.

  • At this point, I probably wouldn't put more effort into identifying the metal. If the color doesn't restore itself through oxidation, I'd just focus on picking a solution that will give you the appearance you want and that you're in a position to try. If you don't like the result, remove it and try a different method.

So how to restore the gold color to the dome? Since we don't know what the finish on the rods is, the resulting color on the dome isn't likely to exactly match the rest of the rod. If that's important, you might want to refinish the entire rod (or both if they will be used together). If an exact match isn't important, consider the fast and easy solution of a brass or polished bronze spray lacquer. The small area might not be that noticeable and a little overspray will help it blend.

If you want the look of a bare yellow metal (no glossy lacquer), there are a few ways to do that.

  • Gild it using an imitation gold leaf, which is usually a brass alloy and the color may be reasonably close. Gilding a curved surface is hard. You would need to do it as a collection of small areas, and could end up with some tiny gaps that are difficult to fill.

  • Brass or bronze powder: This technique involves applying something to the metal that dries a little tacky, at least to fine powders. Then the surface gets dusted with the metal (pigment-sized powder) and burnished, which leaves it looking like polished metal. It's surprisingly durable. A variation on the theme is systems used for fingernail decoration. Those use a UV resin dusted with a metallic-looking powder (not sure if it is even metal, but it looks realistic).

  • Electroplating: You can electroplate brass at home with readily available supplies, and no dangerous chemicals. There are a number of variations on how to do it (search "brass plating at home"). Here's a video to give you an idea of what's involved: How to Electroplate Copper and Brass at Home (it covers both brass and copper plating, done with essentially the same method).

    For some metals, there's a way to plate without a solution bath and power source. You basically rub a paste on the item. I've never explored whether that's available for brass, but it might be worth checking out.

  • Heat plating: I just came across this option. It involves getting the item pretty hot (demonstrated with a steel item), then you brush it with a brass brush and the item picks up some of the brass. Here's a video of the technique: Brass Plating at Home - Brass Brushing. I don't know whether both the brass and the item require the high temperature to transfer the metal (with steel, you heat it to 600°C, which is well below brass's melting point of about 930°C). So, for example, whether you could get a lower melting point metal hot but below its melting point, and it would pick up some brass with this method. But this is a simple, cheap method to try (just be careful not to get the dome hot enough to melt, and if it is made of a soft metal, the brass brush could scratch it).

fixer1234
  • 11,490
  • 2
  • 15
  • 48
  • "I would like to copper-plate George Washington's head" :D Interesting procedures, hopefully I will get around to trying them some time! – Joachim Mar 15 '23 at 22:08
  • Brass plating would be conductive. Lacquer wouldn't. A multimeter or battery+torch bulb+wires would test that (test the test against something known to be conductive, like stainless steel cutlery) – Chris H Mar 16 '23 at 09:32
  • I can't say now which or any of those options I'll try, but I suppose the answer has all the specificity the question allows. Would accepting be appropriate then? – ariola Mar 16 '23 at 10:23
  • @ariola, the question now talks about a solution being moot. Before you close the book on it, see if the color actually changes enough to match. The question could also attract other answers (although that might not be likely while the question says it's moot). But sure, at the point you feel the question has been answered (or no longer requires an answer), you can accept an answer that solves the problem for you or that you think is the most useful one (and you can change your selection later if a better answer comes along). – fixer1234 Mar 16 '23 at 22:10
  • There is nothing to match, as in the present case only the cap will be visible, otherwise I'd sand and treat (or let lie) the required length. The exact color isn't important. And just to clarify, the copper came out after (possibly still ozonized) water treatment. – ariola Mar 17 '23 at 07:27
  • @ariola, LOL. I don't think anyone saw your last picture and explanation coming. If you had explained the application initially, and that only the domes at the end would be visible and that's all you care about, we could have gotten to solutions faster (and my answer would have been very different). – fixer1234 Mar 17 '23 at 16:01
  • Sorry. I thought my first paragraph indicated that. Regarding the head sketch, I didn't want to seem fishing for brownies... – ariola Mar 18 '23 at 08:49