12

Marketers use the fact that different letters are associated with different mental images and emotions when they create brand names.

Studies show that letters and their combinations produce different connotations in terms of size, shape, brightness and overall impression of an object. The letters <a> and <o> symbolize depth and size, while <i> evokes the mental image of something small. Among consonants, soft, voiced sounds such as <d>, <l>, <m>, <n>, <w> can be distinguised from hard, voiceless sound such as <f>, <k>, <r>, <t>, <p>. The soft consonants evoke associations of harmony, softness, gentleness and femininity, while the hard cononants are connected to hardness, dynamism, vigor, strength and masculinty.

(translated from http://comrecon.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/namen-sind-wegweiser-bei-konsumentscheidungen-naming-branding/)

On some other brand name blog I read that the letter <b> is associated with trustworthiness.

What are those studies, and what else has been found regarding the psychology of letters (graphemes) and sounds (phonemes)?

Community
  • 1
  • This is particularly prevalent in the pharmaceutical industry, I'll see if I can dig up the reference. – Chuck Sherrington Jul 16 '14 at 23:33
  • your link does not work, 2) your question is interesting, 3) I assume those studies are anything but scientific. What letters symbolize is probably strongly depending on culture and other determinants (education, genetics) but most of all restricted to a certain language.
    • –  Jul 26 '16 at 10:45
  • Furter, any sentence starting with "studies have shown" without reference makes me sceptical. –  Jul 26 '16 at 10:45
  • @NikolasRieble 1) That was two years ago. I guess the page was deleted by the site owner or moved to a new place. Good practice is giving the source anyway. Sort of like citing a book of which all copies have been burned by the Nazis. Does that make the citation false? –  Jul 26 '16 at 10:54
  • @what: No worries, your citation is not wrong, I only aimed at improving it: by directly citing the original papers ("studies"), you would have enabled me to answer your question two years later. Anyhow, did you find an answer for that question? Do you still have the original sources? If so, please provide them. I am - as I said - interested in the question. –  Jul 26 '16 at 11:01