A non-life process making glucose from carbon dioxide and water using electricity or light?

Question

update (Sept. 2018): Here is a bit of news that someone might be inclined to cite in a "No, not yet, but..." answer.

NASA has announced a CO2 conversion challenge!

Get out of your element! Convert CO2 into molecules to power bio-manufacturing in space.

Convert CO2 to Glucose:

Help us discover ways to develop novel synthesis technologies that use carbon dioxide (CO2) as the sole carbon source to generate molecules that can be used to manufacture a variety of products, including "substrates" for use in microbial bioreactors.

Because CO2 is readily abundant within the Martian atmosphere, such technologies will translate into in-situ manufacturing of products to enable humans to live and thrive on the planet, and also be implemented on Earth by using both waste and atmospheric CO2 as a resource.

It looks like this will be a multi-year project.

original question (Mar. 2017):

A large mass fraction of foodstuff a person would need on a long trip (for example, in space or otherwise not on Earth) would come from its caloric (energy) value. Scenarios have been explored for decades to use solar photovoltaic (or other electric) power to generate light to grow plants locally for food. Light provides energy for photosynthesis which combines $\ce{CO2}$ and $\ce{H2O}$ and makes glucose, (later converted to and stored as starch) which then provides caloric value to food.

$$\ce{6CO2(g) + 6H2O(l) -> C6H12O6(s) + 6O2(g)}$$

I'd like to know if a purely non-life based self-contained chemical process has been developed or is at least close to continuously converting $\ce{CO2}$ and $\ce{H2O}$ to glucose, using electricity directly, or electrically generated light.

By "non-life based" I mean it's not a bioreactor based on living cells. It could certainly use processes that are similar to those used in organisms.

The process would have to be potentially able to run stand-alone with minimum consumables, in the same sense of the term "process" as is mean for the Haber Process.

I am not asking if you think it could be done, but if there is a way that it could be done, based on well-documented research towards implementing complete Artificial Photosynthesis using light or electricity, not just a demonstration where a laboratory technician regularly adds separately prepared reagents and precursors for each step.

related http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/32059/what-are-the-steps-to-creating-synthetic-glucose — Mithoron, Mar 19 '17 at 17:09
also http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/696/energy-efficiency-aside-what-are-the-chemical-constraints-on-co%e2%82%82-capture-and-me — Mithoron, Mar 19 '17 at 17:11
@Mithoron No, those are not really related at all. I've specified starting with $\ce{CO2}$ and $\ce{H2O}$, not cellulose, and ending up with glucose, not methane. — uhoh, Mar 19 '17 at 17:52
I am not certain, but there may be something of use in the research discussed in Phys.org's New dual-atom catalyst shows promise to yield clean energy by artificial photosynthesis which refers to the recent paper in PNAS Stable iridium dinuclear heterogeneous catalysts supported on metal-oxide substrate for solar water oxidation. I've reduced the constraints of the original question a bit, because I think the answer would have been clearly no. — uhoh, Mar 06 '18 at 07:42
It is clearly possible that some chemical process can do this (after all plants do it) but the complexity of the processes used in photosynthesis suggests it is very hard to do it. Possibly alternative routes might be easier but using elements not commonly available to plants (heavier, rare metal catalysts, for example). — matt_black, Sep 04 '18 at 10:58
If I remember the figure quoted to me by Dan Nocera, plants rebuild photosystem II roughly once every 20 minutes. If I remembered that right, it gives a sense for how messy this process is and therefore, complex from a chemical engineering perspective. — Zhe, Feb 21 '19 at 16:27
possibly helpful; Phys.org's Water-splitting module a source of perpetual energy — uhoh, May 04 '20 at 22:46
I was thinking of this too! I think this is a good candidate for both X Prizes - making CO2 extraction valuable, and removing CO2 from the atmosphere! — Jonathan, Mar 01 '21 at 02:47
@Jonathan I don't have any real money to contribute towards an X Prize, but I'll add a nice bounty to an answer that solves these problems :-) — uhoh, Mar 01 '21 at 02:49
I was talking about the X Prizes that Elon Musk is putting out there, 100 million! — Jonathan, Mar 02 '21 at 02:37

score 6 · Accepted Answer · edited Jul 28 '22 at 08:00

6

Popular research these days for CO2 fixation involves the following enzymes with associated conversion rate:

RuBisCO - 10 molecules/sec
ECR(Enoxyl-CoA carboxylase/reductase) - 80 molecules/sec

The major noncarbohydrate precursors are lactate, amino acids, and glycerol.

Here are some links to current research:

TiO2-catalyzed synthesis of sugars from formaldehyde
CO2 reduction -> Hydrocarbon eg. Formaldehydes/acids (CH2O).
Then Formose/Butlerov reaction (catalyst:base+Ca/Mg) -> sugar
Volume 1 of Comprehensive Glycoscience
CO2 to Glucose Whitepaper

Some topics for research:

Gluconeogenesis
Formose reaction
Calvin cycle (absence of light)

edited Jul 28 '22 at 08:00

Glorfindel

2,075
4
20
28

answered Nov 03 '20 at 04:41

Zimba

176
1
4

3

Thanks! This is the type of answer that I was hoping for. The whole synthetic process (CO2 to sugar via electricity or light) hasn't been developed, but you have highlighted work on several key steps along the way. – uhoh Nov 03 '20 at 05:21
2

Turns out I was born a bit late and most of the ice sheet has melted; am working on a similar project with a different mission than providing sustenance on space missions – Zimba Nov 05 '20 at 06:26

A non-life process making glucose from carbon dioxide and water using electricity or light?

1 Answers1

Linked