Does an animal being small or large determine its abundance?
-
2Welcome to Biology.SE! There is an expectation that question-askers show that they have done preliminary research prior to posting. There appear to be many good and free-to-read papers addressing your question, found by a simple Google Scholar search. See -- Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology (PDF) – acvill May 14 '20 at 18:37
-
closely related https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/24482/how-big-should-the-human-population-be-as-predicted-by-body-mass/24495#24495 – Maximilian Press May 19 '20 at 18:25
1 Answers
I'm sympathetic to @Dirigible that this seems like the kind of thing that should be easy to research, but I was surprised to see that there's not an answer to this already on SE.Biology. So very quickly:
Yes, there is what is known as an "allometry" relationship between body size and abundance in which the two tend to be inversely related.
Here is one meta-analysis that attempts to describe the relationship across food webs. Here is a review article that may be easier to read describing the law in somewhat more general terms. Here is a figure from the review with plots showing the relationships in different kinds of organisms from different studies:
In some cases people talk about the population density in some area rather than overall abundance, as density is easier to estimate and can be thought of as a local measure of abundance. From the review you can see that there are some equations that people have derived to describe the relationship:
For large compilations of population densities, the relationship between the average mass of a species (Msp) and its average density (Ncomp) is generally well fit by a power function ($r^2 > 80\%$), with an exponent near 0.75 so that $N_{comp} = cM^{\frac{-3}{4}}$, where c is a constant (also known as Damuth’s Rule)...
- 10,037
- 15
- 57
