8

I have Marathon Plus tires:

  • 5 years old
  • 15000 km
  • bike stored indoors

I'm getting more punctures than I used to, but maybe that's caused by my riding now on worse road surfaces than I used to. The punctures tend to be slow leaks from sharp grit (crushed stone which surfaces an unpaved path) embedding in the rear wheel.

Total weight (me and the bike and stuff) is about 200 lb, and the tires are always properly inflated.

Is it plausible that the tires are less puncture-resistant than they used to be, i.e. is it worth replacing them now if I want to avoid punctures? How can I tell? Is the fact that they still have tread (aren't worn smooth) proof that they're not worn significantly?

Schwalbe's web site says,

Against 'time bombs' such as shards, flints and glass, only a thick rubber belt like Smart Guard will work.

Is it possible that the inner belt isn't working as well as it used to?

The tires are still very rideable but is it likely that they're now significantly less reliable than when new?

It's not nearly as visibly worn as shown on Schwalbe's 'Tyre Wear' page, which shows tyres that are "worn out" and "need replacing urgently", and which says,

The tires of the Marathon family usually last between 6000 and 12000 km. ... The Marathon Plus is outstanding with its extremely high mileage of often much more than 10000 km.

ChrisW
  • 12,033
  • 12
  • 60
  • 95
  • 4
    If stuff is making it through the tire regularly, its time to get new tires. 15k km is a decent run. – Batman Jun 13 '16 at 15:24
  • 1
    Is it the age and/or the distance that matters? Would a low-mileage tire of the same age be similarly affected? Does the rubber get softer or something, for some reason, or does the inner layer compress (get thinner)? – ChrisW Jun 13 '16 at 16:14
  • 2
    With age rubber gets harder, brittle even.(You're advised to change car tyres after 5-6 years for instance.) Debris work through much easier. – Carel Jun 13 '16 at 16:28
  • Grit getting through at the back suggests either vicious grit or a tyre that's failing. I'd expect the back to look noticeably more worn than the front by the mileage you've got. They've served you will, but if you're feeling frugal, maybe just replacing the back (at first) is the way to go – Chris H Jun 13 '16 at 16:52
  • Its also affected by storage. You shouldn't, for example, store your tires near your heater or something indoors. – Batman Jun 13 '16 at 21:56
  • 1
    @ChrisH You're right, the rear tire's tread is nearly worn away (not the front tire's though). The initial (when new) tread depth is only 2 mm so I wasn't sure that (wear / change in thickness) has a significant effect. – ChrisW Jun 14 '16 at 11:46
  • 1
    That wear probably makes the difference between a sharp but of grit having a decent chance of falling out, and it starting to abrade the anti-puncture material straight away. It also increases the attack surface. I haven't yet worn out my marathon plus, but my previous road cruiser (also anti puncture) rear started getting more flats when the limited tread wore out. – Chris H Jun 14 '16 at 15:28
  • 1
    The Marathon Plus should last "often much more than 10000 km", and you've got in the neighborhood of 15000km on them. I'd think if they expected 15000km, they'd be advertising that. You're at 150% of the advertised range, I'd say you've gotten good value for your money. It's time to change them before they abandon you in a very inconvenient way. – FreeMan Jun 15 '16 at 20:04
  • FYI I did change them and I haven't had another puncture since. – ChrisW Apr 29 '17 at 17:38

4 Answers4

13

If this helps at all, I used a set of Marathon Plus tires on a cross-Canada tour last year (8200km), plus a bunch of commuting, totaling about 11,000km. I did not get any flats at any point, but by the end of that distance, the rear tire was pretty bald and I decided to stop using it.

Here's a picture of the tires around 10,000km, front tire on the left, rear on the right. I consider the rear tire bald here since the part actually contacting the road has none of the factory tread remaining.

Comparison view from the top of the front tyre showing significant tread depth and the rear tyre having a significant bald strip through the middle third of the tread

Three thoughts I'll share:

  1. The Smart Guard is an extra layer of rubber between the road side and tube side of the tire, and depending on tire model it is one of a few non-black colors. I think the Marathon Plus is blue, and they do green on some tires, etc. Inspect your tire carefully in good lighting and see if you can see the colored middle layer anywhere, even a small patch. If so I would chuck the tire since that means you've broken through to the middle layer and the road side of the tire could start delaminating from there.

  2. If your tire is bald but you can't see Smart Guard showing through, and you want to keep using it but are getting a lot of flats, check it for small embedded puncturing agents that may be stuck in the tire and puncturing your tubes repeatedly. E.g. on our tour, a couple of the other guys who were also using Marathon Pluses had a run of flats, i.e. one a day for several days. After careful inspection we found a couple of tiny wires, like human hair thickness and 2mm long, embedded in the tire that were almost invisible, but poking through to the inside and putting pinholes in the tubes. We eventually determined they were radial belt wires being picked up from the side of the highway from areas where transport trucks had had blowouts. You can get similar repeated slow punctures from tiny glass slivers.

  3. If your tires look like mine (rear very worn and front quite new looking), resist the temptation to swap them between front and rear wheels. A worn tire is a greater candidate for blowouts and other major failures, which in turn are more likely to cause injury when they happen on the front wheel. If you don't want to replace both tires, then chuck the fully worn rear tire, move the partially worn front tire to the rear, and put a nice new tire on the front. More info on this here.

Hope that helps.

DavidW
  • 5,190
  • 5
  • 23
  • 40
SSilk
  • 4,199
  • 3
  • 24
  • 40
  • 2
    Heh. To me that tyre is barely halfway through its life :) – Móż Jun 14 '16 at 21:38
  • 2
    The tread doesn't really do anything on the road, so a bald tire is fine (even preferable). I'd go until I started having problems with flats. – Batman Jun 16 '16 at 03:54
5

In my experience, tires should be replaced after 4-5 years, regardless of # of miles/KM. The rubber dries out, cracks, and it is easier for debris to puncture old rubber.

Steve
  • 66
  • 1
  • 3
    This is especially true for bikes that are left outdoors. I keep my bike in my garage at night, but using it for commuting it's outside in the sun all day long. The UV and other rays from the sun can have detrimental effects on the tire. Some manufacturers take measures to reduce the effects of UV rays, but over a long time period it's going to be a problem. – Kibbee Jun 13 '16 at 17:07
3

I replace mine when I start getting punctures. That's normally some time after I have a strip of blue all the way round, and before there's more than just odd spots of black showing through the blue. I've done that with several of them, and it seems to be pretty consistent.

But as Steve says, four or five years might also be a good time to replace them, but since I do quite a few kilometres on my bikes that hasn't been an issue for me. I think I would still be inclined to just run the tyre unless it was obviously cracking up, or I was about to start a long tour and thought the old tyre wouldn't last long enough to be worth taking.

Móż
  • 23,532
  • 3
  • 71
  • 120
1

Now five years later after replacing them, the first flat:

enter image description here

Maybe just luck -- the tip of that is sharp -- or maybe the accepted answer is right, that after some 5 years it is less robust.

What bugs me is that Schwalbe's Tire Wear page details the acceptable tire wear but says much less about age.

This quote though ...

How long can a tire be stored?

Schwalbe tires can be stored for up to 5 years without a problem. If possible, they should be stored in a cool, dry and, most importantly, a dark place. When stored properly, even longer storage times may be possible.

... suggests that more than 5 years may be a problem.

It seems wasteful to replace them unnecessarily. But maybe that's what "preventative maintenance" is about.

ChrisW
  • 12,033
  • 12
  • 60
  • 95
  • 7
    This kind of puncture says very little. The main point is that there are no cracks in the rubber that would show that the material is deteriorating. Any tyre can be penetrated by such a screw. – Vladimir F Героям слава Dec 05 '21 at 21:24
  • I'd like to agree. But there weren't any visible cracks or difference in the surface when I successfully replaced them 5 years ago -- if anything maybe they seemed less fat and greasy than when new, as if they were drier. I think 5 years ago the experiment was repeatable -- they were being penetrated repeatedly by small shards of gravel from the bike path, which stopped after I replaced them with new. – ChrisW Dec 05 '21 at 21:34
  • 6
    I've seen exactly this situation before, and the screw punctured the metal rim twice as well. Your tyre had no chance ! – Criggie Dec 05 '21 at 22:45
  • To your last paragraph, I’d assume that Schwalbe’s statement is at least partly CYA. – Weiwen Ng Dec 07 '21 at 09:56