2

The July 14, 2017 NASA Spaceflight article Soyuz 2-1A launches with Kanopus-V-IK and over 70 satellites says:

Mayak is a three-unit CubeSat which was built by Tvoii Sektor Kosmosa – or “Your Sector of Space” – an independent, crowd-funded team of engineers in conjunction with the Moscow State University of Mechanical Engineering. Mayak – meaning Lighthouse – will deploy a highly reflective tetrahedral structure.

Each side of this structure has an area of four square meters, or 43 square feet. To ground observers, the satellite is expected to have an apparent magnitude of up to -10, making it one of the brightest objects in the night sky. The structure will double as a deorbit mechanism, hastening the decay of the satellite’s orbit.

Right now the orbit of the primary payload Kanopus-V-IK 2017-042A, 42825 should be a good guess for the rough predictor of Mayak passes, but once it deploys that giant reflector, things should change quickly.

How is this large reflector made from thin polymer film carefully expanded to and maintained in its full size and shape so that its faces are at least somewhat flat?

below: Screen shot from the YouTube video Mayak. No more space debris!

enter image description here

below: Mayak Reflector – Photo: CosmoMayak, From Spaceflight 101

enter image description here

below: Mayak Artists conception, From NASA Spaceflight

enter image description here

uhoh
  • 148,791
  • 53
  • 476
  • 1,473
  • 1
    It looks like the 4 edges of the reflector are held up with rollup measuring tapes. So deployment would be unrolling the measuring tapes. More details on their website http://cosmomayak.ru/ but it's mostly in Russian. – Hobbes Jul 16 '17 at 18:38
  • @Hobbes that would certainly be fun to watch! The roll-up measuring tapes I've seen like to "roll up", not extend. Unless you pop open the case and then bowaaaannngggg they go crazy. The delicate film makes this a real challenge. – uhoh Jul 16 '17 at 18:52
  • 1
    A measuring tape contains a spring that retracts the tape. Remove that, and the tape stays put, and can be rolled out with a motor. – Hobbes Jul 17 '17 at 07:28
  • @Hobbes I see, so three carefully oriented tapes with the springs removed, one (or better yet three) motors could do it if the reflector film were folded in a clever way, and the film didn't have any tendency to stick to itself. This must be interesting to watch, I wonder if the whole mechanism first extends out of the 3U body before any of this happens. Somehow this reminds me a tiny bit of the challenges with the JWST films, although the solution is different. – uhoh Jul 17 '17 at 07:42
  • Do we know what the observed angular width will be? Are we launching a new moon here? –  Jul 17 '17 at 17:08
  • @barrycarter it would have to be 3,000 meters wide or more to look as big as the moon in LEO when overhead. Since it fits in a 3U cubesat and each of the four faces is only 4 square meters... – uhoh Jul 17 '17 at 19:15
  • @uhoh If I'm remembering correctly, magnitude is a measure of total brightness, not brightness per surface area. -10 magnitude in a pinpoint would have extremely high brightness, no? –  Jul 18 '17 at 03:33
  • @barrycarter Iridium flares of brightness −5 magnitude occur 3–4 times per week; −8 magnitude may be visible 3–5 times per month for stationary observers. It's quantitatively reasonable that a reflector designed to maximize its flare capability be a few magnitudes brighter than an Iridium satellite. The actual brightness will depend in part on how wrinkled versus smooth the faces become after deployment, but there's nothing unusual about the brightness of a ten foot wide flat piece of 90% reflective aluminized film in LEO. – uhoh Jul 18 '17 at 05:26
  • @barrycarter It also works out if you calculate it. The ratio of the solid angles of the satellite and the Sun as seen from Earth is about 4E-07. As long as the wrinkles don't spread the light by more than a quarter of a degree it means the reflected light would be 4E-07 as bright as the sun. That ratio is +16 magnitudes. Starting with the Sun's brightness of -27 magnitude, that gets to -11 magnitude. All is well, everything is in order here. Again, it all depends on how wrinkled versus smooth the faces become after deployment. – uhoh Jul 18 '17 at 05:37

1 Answers1

1

I've posted this answer to make sure there is some information here. If someone would like to use this as a starting point for an additional answer, that's great!


The comment by @Hobbes seems to be correct. I've just found the YouTube video A tour through the Mayak project and I show some screenshots below.

The original plan was to use ammonium carbonate or baker's ammonia that produces both ammonia and carbon dioxide gas when reacted with water. However, the video points out that the ammonia will tend to refreeze out on the inside of the film (bp: -33°C, mp: -78°C) and the ultralight PET film is too porous to hold pressure.

So motor-driven tape measures provide stiff extensors that can be rolled out with an electric motor.

Let's hope it works!

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

uhoh
  • 148,791
  • 53
  • 476
  • 1,473