3

I have seen this question but still don't understand how the Kronecker product is a tensor product. If $T_1 : V_1 \to W_1$ and $T_2 :V_2 \to W_2$ are linear transformations their matrix representation with respect to chosen bases are $[T_1]_{m \times n} $ and $[T_2]_{m' \times n'} $ and their K-product is a $(mm') \times (nn')$ matrix. On the other hand there is a natural isomorphism between $L (V_i, W_i)$ and $V_i^* \otimes W_i$ for $i=1,2$. Now let $\widetilde{T}_1$ and $\widetilde{T}_2$ be the corresponding tensors, $\widetilde{T}_1 \otimes \widetilde{T}_2$ is like a $(2,2)$ tensor which is a rank two tensor so is not a matrix.

Kavim
  • 173
  • 2
    I think you want to say $V_i^* \otimes W_i$. Anyway, doesn't the $(p,q)$ tensor thing only make sense if you have one fixed vector space? – Hoot Jul 08 '16 at 22:56
  • @Hoot You are right I think, feel free to edit it. what I wrote is with a big abuse of language(notation). – Kavim Jul 08 '16 at 23:13

2 Answers2

3

Think about what you are doing when you write down a matrix for a linear map $\ell: V \to W$. You are just writing the linear map as a linear combination of maps of the form $e_i^* \otimes f_j$, where $e_1,e_2, \dots$ is a basis for $V$ with dual basis $e_1^*, e_2^* \dots$ and $f_1,f_2, \dots$ is a basis for $W$. The entries of the matrix are just the coefficients of the linear combination.

Now given two linear maps $\ell: V \to W$, $\ell': V' \to W'$ we get a linear map $\ell \otimes \ell': V \otimes V' \to W \otimes W'$ which sends $v\otimes v'$ to $\ell(v)\otimes \ell'(v')$. The Kronecker product of matrices is just the matrix for this linear map expressed in the bases $e_i \otimes e'_j$ and $f_i \otimes f'_j$.

Nate
  • 11,206
3

Let $A_i$ denote the matrix of the transformation $T_i$ with respect to the canonical basis of $V_i$ and $W_i$ for each $i$. Let $(e_{i,j})$ denote the canonical basis of $V_i$, and $f_{i,j}$ the basis of $W_i$.

The matrix of $T_1\otimes T_2$ with respect to the bases $\{e_{1,j}\otimes e_{2,k}\}$ and $\{f_{1,j} \otimes f_{2,k}\}$ (each taken in lexicographical order) is the Kronecker product.

Ben Grossmann
  • 225,327
  • If so, let T1 be of dim $p_1 \times q_1$, T2 be $p_2 \times q_2$, the tensor product should produce a (0,4) tensor. How can I recogonize the final $p_1 p_2 \times q_1 q_2$ dim matrix as a (0,4) tensor? – N.Li Jun 17 '23 at 08:39