2

I am a 15 year old ham, and just got my Extra class. I was really bummed when I figured out I needed to be 18 to be a Volunteer Examiner administer. Why do they make that rule?

Phil Frost - W8II
  • 51,701
  • 6
  • 88
  • 212
Skyler 440
  • 7,600
  • 7
  • 49
  • 89

2 Answers2

6

Congress sets the rules the FCC has to follow, and the rule in particular requiring an age limit is Title 47, Volume 5, Part 97, Subpart F:

§ 97.509 Administering VE requirements.
...
(b) Each administering VE must:
...
(2) Be at least 18 years of age;

It would take an act of Congress to change this rule. I haven't discovered the reason for this rule, but if you look through the amendments to Part 97 over time you may be able to discover which congress made the change, and reading the congressional record may indicate why.

Adam Davis
  • 12,125
  • 2
  • 47
  • 107
  • 2
    You presume congress needs a reason to make rules (or not make them, as is sometimes the problem). – Phil Frost - W8II Feb 03 '14 at 19:24
  • 2
    Perhaps because 18 years is the "age of majority" in the US. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_majority – Ron J. KD2EQS Apr 30 '14 at 13:18
  • While I have no documents to back up this claim, I have to wonder if fact that 18 and up makes you an adult under the USA legal system and therefore subject to more harsh penalties under the law if convicted. There was a great deal of concern that the VEC system would not adequately test applicants. As it is there are restrictions such as a VE not be able to administer tests to relatives. – Jim Jan 13 '20 at 18:44
  • This answer is basically "why do you have to be 18? because that's the rules!" — but the question is really "Why did they make that the rule?" And I could be wrong, but I don't think it's accurate in its details of how the Title 47 rules are set/changed either: https://ham.stackexchange.com/q/16042/1362 – natevw - AF7TB Jan 30 '20 at 19:20
-1

The licence is a legal document.. A binding contract. A person has to be 18 to sign a binding legal contract. Very valid reasons.

Larry
  • 1